hnsucks2

4 ms·

1.
by hnsucks2 10y ago
By the way, we already do this! We let millions starve to death in squalor already. Why? For the sake of civilization. Or do you think it'd be smart to ship them all over here? Amazing how timid we are about weighing life against life
2.
by hnsucks2 10y ago
For a start, the cities you list contain many valuable people. Places doing lots of slash-and-burn farming, not so much. My original comment was a bit facetious, but if it is a civilization-ending threat (and I'm not saying it is), bet
3.
by hnsucks2 10y ago
Does nerve gas harm trees?
4.
by hnsucks2 10y ago
>First we'd have to stop the massive deforestation that's happening right now. A lot of that is for agriculture, so we'd have to find another way to feed those people. You say that like we couldn't just let them starv
5.
by hnsucks2 10y ago
Where else are they going to go? There is a "significant overlap" between social justice and anti-white, anti-male, anti-cis propaganda. There's no convenient label to stick on that one just yet, but if you want to be consist
6.
by hnsucks2 10y ago
"Boring question", yet you responded to it. Reality is "complicated", yet the move is "obviously positive". Others think it would be "obviously positive" for social justice accounts to be suspended. M
7.
by hnsucks2 10y ago
We don't have to look far back in history to see what it would be like to live under "communists", either.
8.
by hnsucks2 10y ago
Are the banned "alt-right" commentators commensurate with ISIS propagandists? If so, how much else ought to be banned? Black power groups? Anti-fascist groups? Many "social justice" accounts post anti-white, anti-male me
9.
by hnsucks2 10y ago
It's rather glib, actually. There is a legitimate question of whether companies like Twitter should operate with neutrality on these issues, regardless of how poorly the issue is broached.