hnreader998

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hnreader998 6y ago

   I don't disagree. My main point is that at a bay area tech company, the cost is one-sided, which drives company policies and philosophies, all while endlessly preaching about diversity.
2. 2.▲
   by hnreader998 6y ago

   I don't agree. The fact is that women simply represent a small percentage of the overall workforce in engineering. The only way you can get parity in representation is to get parity in the underlying workforce. The only way to do that
3. 3.▲
   by hnreader998 6y ago

   I should have been more clear. Like someone else mentioned, these diversity (and inclusion) discussions are not related to discrimination laws and equal opportunity. They are always related to increasing diversity in the company by hiring m
4. 4.▲
   by hnreader998 6y ago

   It's even worse than unavoidable. My company has removed any kind of anonymous discussion/Q&A, which just fuels a mono culture. You only get one-sided discussions because going against the grain will be career suicide.
5. 5.▲
   by hnreader998 6y ago

   Oddly, companies are actively and deliberately discriminating against race and gender in tech companies in the name of diversity and inclusion. It boggles my mind that none of them have been sued yet for these practices.