hnnoob2003

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hnnoob2003 9y ago

   Your willingness to think critically and challenge "the truth" is great, especially questioning whether Howard Brennan's testimony is reliable and free from manipulation. There are certainly many dubious points about Oswald a
2. 2.▲
   by hnnoob2003 9y ago

   Thanks for the fast response! If he was looking for grandeur, why wouldn't he blare it to the press? The anti-Cuba speech is interesting and could help establish motive. The most damaging elements against Oswald are that he went home,
3. 3.▲
   by hnnoob2003 9y ago

   Thanks for recommending the book above. It seems helpful in separating fact from fiction. From skimming Oswald's Wikipedia's page, a few questions emerge suggesting both guilt and innocence. * Why did he walk home, change clothes,