hn_ta

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hn_ta 5y ago

   > for example, argues that relying on taxing shareholders instead of the corporation ignores foreign shareholders whose income isn't subject to US taxation. And that is a good point to discuss/argue, regardless of the messenger
2. 2.▲
   by hn_ta 5y ago

   > But it's not just about 'consumers' is it? Who else is it about? If any sort of investigation is to be brought into it, the main investigation would be on behalf of consumers right? > "single-handedly makes up 4%
3. 3.▲
   by hn_ta 5y ago

   Why don't you argue the point and offer an alternative opinion or rebuttal instead of profiling the messenger?
4. 4.▲
   by hn_ta 5y ago

   > - We are a start up working hard to launch so it wouldn't work for us. I read this as: "we've advertised this as full time, but really it's 24/7" I think that's a reach. I fail to understand how you&#