hluska

14 ms·

331.
by hluska 1y ago
It’s not anymore. Section 232 came into effect on August 1 and totally changes things. I linked to some info on 232 in a previous reply to you.
332.
by hluska 1y ago
Sorry bud, but I don’t think you’re aware of section 232. It became effective on August 1. https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/entry-summ...
333.
by hluska 1y ago
Short term yes. But (this isn’t a defense of tariffs), the concept is that this will spur on domestic production in raw materials. So with this example, if there is a domestic source of copper it wouldn’t be subject to tariffs at all. In th
334.
by hluska 1y ago
> But in non fiction a lot of this is done or you. You are given the order and a lot of the glue. The glue you are missing is probably relatively obvious ("why did they do this?") and you can get that information and include it
335.
by hluska 1y ago
It’s not so much a secret as a set of tradeoffs. A few years back, I learned that I had made the wrong tradeoffs - I was unbelievably obese and got to spend a week in a cardiac ward because of a whole lot of bad choices. My kid was only 16
336.
by hluska 1y ago
I worked in surveillance cameras for a long time and started my own company in the field. So, I wouldn’t be so quick to diminish the value of location/bearing. Armed with those details, a sufficiently motivated person with an easy to o
337.
by hluska 1y ago
Section A of 18.2-152.4 reads: “A. It is unlawful for any person, with malicious intent, or through intentionally deceptive means and without authority, to:” And Mr. Mbengue plead no contest to this charge, so he did not admit guilt but agr
338.
by hluska 1y ago
That’s unclear. Mr. Mbengue plead no contest to a trespass charge. He was represented by an attorney with some prosecutorial experience so I think we can assume he received qualified legal advice based upon the facts of the matter. Under te
339.
by hluska 1y ago
> in a move that was later declared illegal To be fair, a lower court ruled it “illegal exaction” but awarded $0 in damages as the illegal exaction prevented bankruptcy which would have zeroed out the investment anyways. Then the Federal
340.
by hluska 1y ago
That would not only be incredibly expensive, but there would be a period while quality catches up.
341.
by hluska 1y ago
You’re proposing that the United States government force Apple to invest in Intel? Apple chose a different supplier than Intel; at this point it’s hard to consider Intel a competitor to TSMC but let’s pretend they are. You have proposed a “
342.
by hluska 1y ago
I could have understood it in a month - onboard, try something out and decide if it helps. But a week and then a meeting on a Saturday to explain why or get fired? Management is hard so I’m generally a little more patient with managerial mi
343.
by hluska 1y ago
Intel is public and their financials have indicated this would happen. Even at my most irrationally exuberant their stock buybacks didn’t make much sense. I’m not sure what “more transparency would look like to you, but publicly traded comp
344.
by hluska 1y ago
That’s a form of political change - direct representation democracy and recall legislation are both possibilities. The solution is to make electoral change happen, not to complain that everything is hopeless on the internet.
345.
by hluska 1y ago
> If they don't then they're stupid They’re just not experienced because this has never happened before. But when you call them stupid, they’re not going to listen to you because they won’t like you.
346.
by hluska 1y ago
I’ve seen LLMs rolled out in several organizations now and have noticed a few patterns. The big one is that we have less experienced people reviewing code an LLM generated for them. They don’t have the experience to pick out those solutions
347.
by hluska 1y ago
You’re expecting models to constantly retrain themselves based on riddles. That’s not very reasonable nor is it even economically feasible right now. At massive scale, I question whether it’s even technically feasible.
348.
by hluska 1y ago
You know friend, if open source actually worked like that I wouldn’t be so allergic to releasing projects. But it doesn’t - a large swath of the economy depends on unpaid labour being treated poorly by people who won’t or can’t contribute.
349.
by hluska 1y ago
Your friend isn’t very smart and you’d likely be better off if you stopped quoting them. You’ve just lumped every single NGO in with a very small minority of bad ones - three seconds of research would have spared you from writing that.
350.
by hluska 1y ago
I’m not sure where to begin. The World Bank is not an NGO and is not funded like you think. And (to steal your phrase) TFA explains it in detail - purchasing power parity was updated so the number was updated. All in, this comment is nonsen
351.
by hluska 1y ago
So, “only” was figurative? Why was it used? The entire sentence would have been better without it. Or you’re wrong. Somewhere in there.
352.
by hluska 1y ago
I went to university to become a better citizen of the world. My parents are as middle class as they come. Sorry but you’re wrong.
353.
by hluska 1y ago
Or more charitably, the manager had no idea and none of their reports had enough social skills to explain?
354.
by hluska 1y ago
I parent completely differently than most, but this top three really gets me: - Text does not actually provide guidance to a large percentage of your user base as they can’t read it How do kids learn to read without exposure? - Text takes u
355.
by hluska 1y ago
In most countries, the default is whether the person had a lawful reason to be carrying the weapon used and that the defense is proportional to the attack. There’s nothing insane about that - there’s zero reason to arm yourself and millions
356.
by hluska 1y ago
Yet strangely, Canada has almost the exact same media and near identical mental health statistics and the country has a tiny fraction of the school shootings in the United States. Like it or not, the availability of military grade weapons
357.
by hluska 1y ago
Five Eyes is (or was, as its status is undetermined) an intelligence sharing agreement between the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Each nation has to abide by its own constitution and intelligence gathe
358.
by hluska 1y ago
This whole thing is quite the stretch. Someone who clearly has no idea what they’re talking about acted like a know it all on a forum. I don’t see how that’s evidence of a coordinated attack. Police saying dumb things about security tech i
359.
by hluska 1y ago
Or maybe the democracies at the centre of the Epstein issue have constitutional protections limiting how dragnets get used.
360.
by hluska 1y ago
This is anecdata, but with my own very limited (by choice) website analytics, I see a strong correlation between Linux users and headless browsers. So while my Linux user base seems higher than ever before so is my headless traffic. When I

More ›