hkwerf

9 ms·

31.
by hkwerf 2y ago
It is orthogonal, yes. To your question, I have an example from the same domain, where it is reasonable to mix unrolling panic with code that never panics. Typically, safety-related processes are set up in two phases. First they set up, the
32.
by hkwerf 2y ago
They already did that with the Zynq Ultrascale+ ( https://www.amd.com/en/products/adaptive-socs-and-fpgas/soc/... ). I have never seen one used professionally, though, whereas the MPSoCs are everywhere, it
33.
by hkwerf 2y ago
As the author mentions, `panic!` is also not an acceptable failure mode in some applications. If you're developing safety-critical software and a process stopping is part of your risk analysis, many frameworks will ask you about the f
34.
by hkwerf 2y ago
That is explicitly addressed by the regulation. If an AI product is used in a way you describe it, there need to be measures put in place to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. If these measures are missing, it cannot even be put into s
35.
by hkwerf 2y ago
> Anything that this regulation doesn't allow is by definition "unacceptable", That's not true. The regulation first defines high-risk products with a narrow scope (see article 5 and annex III). It then requires risk
36.
by hkwerf 2y ago
The "high risk" list, though, is essentially traditional safety functions (article 6) and functions that affect fundamental rights and access to basic services (annex III)? It's not that broad at all either.
37.
by hkwerf 2y ago
The law specifically refers to putting a product in to service or placing a product on the market if they are on the prohibited (article 5) or high-risk (article 6, annex III) list and don't have an applicable exception. IANAL, but it&
38.
by hkwerf 2y ago
> There is no way a law like that can be enforced except by large companies. Other fields have very similar laws in the EU and there's lots of tiny companies able to comply with those. The risk control required by this law is the sa
39.
by hkwerf 2y ago
Training that function is not banned. Concentrating information is not banned. I have no idea where you're taking that from. Only making use (i.e. putting into service a product containing it or placing that product on the market) of t
40.
by hkwerf 2y ago
They generally are. For reference, here's what eurocontrol's controllers have to expect a pilot to do when issued a TCAS RA: https://web.archive.org/web/20120305182903/http://www.euroco... >
41.
by hkwerf 2y ago
I'd love to see this realized. However, given the issues we've been having with cables in the Baltic Sea in recent months, this would probably be a huge attack surface in case of any kind of conflict.
42.
by hkwerf 2y ago
That being said, though, members contribute more than money. A lot of the work done at CERN is not done on CERN budgets, but on the budgets of member institutes.
43.
by hkwerf 2y ago
Here it's more the other way around. CERN needs a data analysis framework, so CERN develops, maintains and publishes it for other users. That being said, I don't know whether it's actually a good idea for someone external to
44.
by hkwerf 2y ago
Maybe it's the opposite? ANC headphones are lacking a means of communicating to people that you're not hearing them. However, if your ANC headphones link you looking at someone with unmuting them, that communication barrier is cro
45.
by hkwerf 2y ago
I've been using both for a while and cannot remember having any issues like this.
46.
by hkwerf 2y ago
It's likely that there will be an I2C-enabled FRAM chip on there, though there are a few other devices which could hold those FRAM cells. I2C is ubiquitous, even more so than USB, and trivial to implement. There will certainly be enoug
47.
by hkwerf 2y ago
The part you quoted has the one argument against yours right at the end. It's not about hardware or IDEs or text editors, it's about workspace layout.
48.
by hkwerf 2y ago
Planned in 2007, entered operation in 2020? Yes, given the changes in the last four years, it is not new!
49.
by hkwerf 2y ago
> 5 days ago: https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-g ... This article is riddled with statements that are factually incorrect. :( I guess this is hard to research if you don't speak G
50.
by hkwerf 2y ago
You'll notice that, if you read the original messages, nowhere did they suggest anything concrete. They're just offering to investigate what would need to be done to continue operation. This is just blown out of proportion and thu
51.
by hkwerf 2y ago
At night, we don't really need that much electricity. In German winters, we have a lot of wind energy instead.
52.
by hkwerf 2y ago
There are no new coal plants, instead coal plants are scheduled for shutdown or conversion. New gas plants are required to make use of gas as a storage medium one way or another.
53.
by hkwerf 2y ago
> First, modern nuclear power plants can do load-following just fine, you often just don't want to because their variable costs are so low that it just makes more sense to keep them running. So, I read a bit and this seems to be act
54.
by hkwerf 2y ago
Nuclear is almost as non-dispatchable? As soon as you've ramped up a nuclear reactor to full power, the weather has changed. Thus they essentially occupy almost the same niche. Those who plan to use both nuclear and wind/solar don
55.
by hkwerf 2y ago
I'm not sure whether there is a legal twitter entity in Australia, but it may not need a legal basis to control. In this case, it's sufficient to have a legal basis to censor, no matter the path Twitter users in Australia choose t
56.
by hkwerf 2y ago
Whether you approve of this censoring or not, it is law within Australia. If in a conjunction of services a loophole emerges, the censor needs to find someone to eliminate that loophole. Now, Australia can either prohibit encrypted connecti
57.
by hkwerf 2y ago
No, I'm saying the opposite.
58.
by hkwerf 2y ago
Not even more ? For a commonly available technology, this should be far too many? > More than 660 e-bike battery fires have erupted across the city since 2019, killing 28 New Yorkers and injuring 400 more.
59.
by hkwerf 2y ago
According to RFC 9110: - POST: Perform resource-specific processing on the request content. - PUT: Replace all current representations of the target resource with the request content. I interpret this as the only immediate side-effect of PU
60.
by hkwerf 2y ago
dnsmasq is such a nice tool. I use it daily, for work with embedded devices. Its simple configuration also allows me to quickly provide "default" network configurations, simply by copy-pasting the command and parameters to invoke

More ›