hkmaxpro

21 ms·

181.
The Brazilian Amazon has 'flipped' to become major producer of greenhouse gasses(thehill.com)
50 points by hkmaxpro 5y ago|25 comments
182.
With the Kremlin’s blessing, Russian companies embrace biometric ambitions(restofworld.org)
2 points by hkmaxpro 5y ago|0 comments
183.
Taiwan bans recruitment from China to combat chip talent poaching(asia.nikkei.com)
3 points by hkmaxpro 5y ago|0 comments
184.
by hkmaxpro 5y ago
They plan to provide a PPA for Gnome 40 on Ubuntu 21.04 https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/introducing-gnome-40/21508 In the mean time, there is an unofficial PPA https://launchpad.net/~shemgp/+ar
185.
A Different Kind of Army: The Militarization of China’s Internet Trolls(jamestown.org)
3 points by hkmaxpro 6y ago|0 comments
186.
Shanghai security files expose China's surveillance state, monitoring of Uyghurs(abc.net.au)
10 points by hkmaxpro 6y ago|1 comments
187.
China’s loan contracts reveal its hold over low-income nations(ft.com)
2 points by hkmaxpro 6y ago|0 comments
188.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Thanks for your source. Let me assess how much of his conclusions and the conclusions in the news reporting are affected, assuming the Grayzone article is correct. I just take a random article from CNN: https://edition.cnn.com&#x
189.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Thanks for pointing out the tweets. The mistakes called out in the tweets look like typos that are not critical to the major conclusions of the paper. For instance, if the paper is about how IUD insertion changes over time, and consistently
190.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
> The Newlines report relies heavily on Adrian Zenz' questionable work, often directly, but also indirectly via quoting from news reporting that uses Zenz' work as its primary source I randomly skim through the citations in the
191.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Have you watched the victims’ testimony videos and this primary evidence report? https://shahit.biz/eng/ Or this report [0] by more than 50 global experts in international law, genocide, and China? [0] https:/&#x
192.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
I disagree that incomplete censorship is noise. Any ban is a ban, even if incomplete. Trivializing and rationalizing CCP censorship acts is why it can keep censoring so many for so long. (Case in point: H&M is just censored from all maj
193.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
I also apologize for my overly confrontational approach. I mistook you as one of the wumaodang (fifty-cent party) who keeps denying and apologizing CCP behavior. (There is one such user with exactly this user name in some of the comments in
194.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
> you assume that I support all the exaggerated points above (none of them mine) Because you have never admitted censorship of Winnie the Pooh happened on Chinese social media. You kept questioning many of the evidence I provided (“if on
195.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
> I can not verify your claim since I don't play Kingdom Hearts When you Google “Kingdom Hearts III China Cenorship”, Google returns more than 4 million results. Assuming there are repetitions and only 0.1% of them (i.e. 4K results)
196.
H&M Removed from All Major Chinese Platforms over Xinjiang Cotton Ban(yahoo.com)
4 points by hkmaxpro 6y ago|0 comments
197.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Winnie the Pooh was censored in the Chinese version of the video game Kingdom Hearts III [0][1]. Do you think a massive white blot around Winnie the Pooh in every appearance is a “misunderstanding”? As I pointed out in another comment, it w
198.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
It was the most censored Weibo post in 2015, according to Dr. Fu Kingwa, who ran the Weiboscope censorship tracker out of Hong Kong University’s Journalism and Media Studies Centre: https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12&#x2
199.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Douyin even banned speakers of Cantonese [0][1], a language spoken by 80M+ speakers and a top-20 language in the world [2]. Cantonese was widely spoken in Guangdong until the CCP actively wiped it out [3]. Among the 204 members of the CCP
200.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
The stream was cutoff after a white guy appeared for a minute. If it’s not race detection, I don’t know what it is. https://twitter.com/JoshuaDummer/status/1280877750245453828 https://www.taiwannews.com
201.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Read the whole Genocide Convention of 1948: > genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: > (a) Killing members of the group
202.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Why do we need another word? The Genocide Convention of 1948 (a response to the Holocaust) specifically mentions “Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group” and “Forcibly transferring children of the group to another gro
203.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
There are “growth regulator herbicides” and “growth-disrupting insecticides” that harm the growth of plants or inhibiting the reproduction of insects withing killing them. Xinjiang genocide is just the same.
204.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Yes, genocide is happening. From the Genocide Convention of 1948: [0] > Article II > In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, raci
205.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Funny how you asked others to “use a single source that contains the numbers”, and yet you make arguments without providing any sources, as you did in your other comment I linked above. How do we know your arguments aren’t “based on really
206.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
> It really isn't much to ask for. If you're making arguments based on really really shaky data you should not be making them at all. Can you demonstrate your principles with your other comment [0], by using “a single source th
207.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
Two articles explaining how different groups of observers arrive at the estimate of a million: https://qz.com/1599393/how-researchers-estimate-1-million-uy... https://www.chinafile.com/reporting-opinion
208.
Sheryl Sandberg, Resign(newrepublic.com)
1 points by hkmaxpro 6y ago|1 comments
209.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
> reinterpretation had a majority support of Hong Kong people Source for your claim? Contrary to your claim, “The Democratic Party strongly believes that reinterpretation of the Basic Law by the NPCSC is unacceptable” https://
210.
by hkmaxpro 6y ago
> It’s the vehement majority of Hong Kong people who gave rights to reinterpret Basic Law to stem the flow of people from mainland China (since court of final appeal was going to allow spouses and children of Hong Kong residents from oth

More ›