hirsin

32 ms·

391.
by hirsin 7y ago
I imagine OP was referring to internal partners. I still like the idea, but actually recording how much team time a partner team wastes opens up more problems than it's likely to solve.
392.
by hirsin 7y ago
So it's an off by one error in the post?
393.
by hirsin 7y ago
Yep. Use FIDO2 keys to require a PIN or fingerprint to activate the key. This is why android/ios as a FIDO key is great - easy to lock, so built in two factors.
394.
by hirsin 7y ago
Tell that to the construction industry. This is incredibly common behavior for industries and housing construction - its what gets you out of superfund sites and repairing the subpar housing you threw up in 2010.
395.
by hirsin 7y ago
For internal, as long as the sender was in the right, I'd be suitably ashamed. I try to keep inbox zero (after dozens of filters), so it means I've really messed up to get those mails (or had bad filters). But yeah - if they'
396.
by hirsin 7y ago
No - you're thinking the other Visual Studio Online which is now called Azure DevOps. It's "just" a source repository explorer with CI functionality.
397.
by hirsin 7y ago
Should have nothing to do with github and everything to do with you putting your code on the internet with a permissive license. Google or Eclipse could do this too (and I expect they do, since it's the best corpus of code available).
398.
by hirsin 8y ago
Hearsay from folks I know at FB - you use your personal account at work. There's no work account/personal account split.
399.
by hirsin 8y ago
That's a nice thought, but in reality lots of poorly coded sites out there do UA sniffing instead of feature detection. So lots of sites break (including many Google sites) if they think you don't have Chromium feature sets.
400.
by hirsin 8y ago
Fairly certain you can't edit the news/paper/ after it's been printed and distributed.
401.
by hirsin 8y ago
Yes, I misread and typo'd.
402.
by hirsin 8y ago
Yes, I misread and typo'd, thinking OP was talking id_tokens and OIDC. Completely correct on the last para, I spend quite a bit of time convincing partners of this.
403.
by hirsin 8y ago
Look at the JWT, take the issuer claim, take the .well-known config off that url, and you have keys. Match that against the known permanent issuer you expected, and verify the signature of the JWT against the keys. If you're accepting
404.
by hirsin 8y ago
Mine also changed after I complained that the results were obviously wrong. It indicated that several of my chromosome pairs came entirely from my father. Since that's generally impossible, it put the rest of the results in doubt.
405.
by hirsin 8y ago
I was wondering when these folks would pick up blockchain. Their particular brand of feudalism weirdly synergizes with the general philosophy of the blockchain crowd, despite them appearing to be at odds. Maybe it's the semi sovereign
406.
by hirsin 8y ago
I wouldn't necessarily ascribe anything shady here (which I got a bit of from your comment, if that was intended). I found this helpful in debugging an issue I've had with my OnePlus - namely, many apps that I'd like to get n
407.
by hirsin 8y ago
There's a decent moneystuff article about how this is assumed to happen (with email evidence) https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2015-09-21/bad-in...
408.
by hirsin 8y ago
Because that's not what it's saying? Safer sex means not getting HIV in this context. Similarly, not having unintended children would also be a benefit that does not say anything about forbidding people from raising children if th
409.
by hirsin 8y ago
On the contrary - no mortgages would mean I couldn't afford a house, and someone richer than me would buy it and loan^H^H^H rent it to me. They'd get richer, and do the same to the next person who couldn't quite afford to buy
410.
by hirsin 8y ago
Case Western did this, or was considering it. There was backlash from the alumni though - from appearances and description it sounded like it would function as a cap on students with financial need, rather than an avenue for affirmative act
411.
by hirsin 8y ago
Good to know, thanks!
412.
by hirsin 8y ago
Only people on this site have willingly enabled 2fa (to a decent first order estimate). The remainder are forced to by tenant administrators or the occasional application owner who understands they gate important data (eg NuGet requires 2fa
413.
by hirsin 8y ago
That conversation about for..in - any JS experts that can say whether modules or other new advances will help with this? Not being able to use the standard functions on primitives because random other code messes with them sounds like pogo
414.
by hirsin 8y ago
If you want to be a member of many of these platforms, and you're a target of that offensive material, you do have to tolerate it. The racists use the platforms tools to find you and hurl it at you, and then the platform gives you litt
415.
by hirsin 8y ago
Cheating, to be blunt. The person reading out the orders (OP) decided to ignore what was written on the paper and make up something. Difficult to pull off though - in every game I've played the written moves are shown to everyone, just
416.
by hirsin 8y ago
Fair - to be pedantic, no IDP should accept your biometrics as a credential on its own, addressable from anywhere on the internet. The goal is that an attacker has to steal your physical device and get access to your biometrics, which is si
417.
by hirsin 8y ago
So don't do SMS OTP and use an authenticator app instead, which is more secure. And inflammatory comments aside, yes, any good IT org should believe that it's more likely for a user to be phished and give away their super secure x
418.
by hirsin 8y ago
No one should ever be putting your biometrics in the cloud. Similar to a PIN, they are only used to secure a device locally once you've already authenticated. So eg you prove ownership of your email + phone number to authenticate, then
419.
by hirsin 8y ago
It's part of the contract for most standard corporations (that aren't B Corps) - the management has a duty to do what's best for the company, which usually comes out to "have a good reason behind doing something".
420.
by hirsin 8y ago
Forced to maintain a road that was included in the easement he agreed to upon purchasing it, yes.

More ›