hiljusti

3 ms·

1.
by hiljusti 3y ago
Check out "Dumb Site Generator" https://so.dang.cool/blog/2024-01-22-DSG-Dumb-Site-Generator
2.
by hiljusti 3y ago
Formerly known as `rtx`
3.
by hiljusti 3y ago
Location: US Remote: Only Willing to relocate: No Technologies: Yes. Polyglot, multi-discipline, the weirder the better Résumé/CV: https://so.dang.cool and https://linkedin.com/in/justinroberthill Emai
4.
by hiljusti 4y ago
Well sure, there's Stackage, and there's Nix, and there's some other options. Haskell, for my money, is similar to Node.js in that I don't have confidence I could reliably expect the state of Haskell development _today_
5.
by hiljusti 4y ago
I appreciate Hackage and its lack of garbage, although I think the exclusivity can't scale. I also like Haskell's module system All other aspects of Haskell package management feel unfinished, like "an exercise left to the re
6.
by hiljusti 4y ago
Cargo and Leiningen are the only two build/package tools I've used that are legitimately pleasant and unobtrusive. (And Cargo is more pleasant than Leiningen but I think that's the rest of the toolchain like rustc, clippy, et
7.
by hiljusti 4y ago
Not necessary, but certainly it's easier to implement and get stuff done. It starts to break down and show its cracks the larger and larger it gets, though. The difference between almost all Linux or BSD packaging systems and nixpkgs i
8.
by hiljusti 6y ago
I mean, I agree when build times take more than a minute, I don't care about seconds. Have you used languages that take less than a few seconds (in total) to compile? Also in my experience Crystal compiles simple projects faster than R