hiddeninplain

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hiddeninplain 9mo ago

   Again, I find it very difficult to get past your own personal "language game"s. > Game over. Is a perfect example. What "game" is "over"? Chomsky's philosophical linguistics have long been derided and
2. 2.▲
   by hiddeninplain 9mo ago

   You seem to be relying too heavily on your own "language games". For instance, flip flopping between using "LLM technology" and "AI" to refer to what appears to be the same thing in your argument. I find it all
3. 3.▲
   by hiddeninplain 9mo ago

   It seems you have abandoned your thesis in order to retain your belief that concerns about imagegen tech "are worthless". Defining "concerns about AI" broadly as "is it art?" while obstinately denying the possi
4. 4.▲
   by hiddeninplain 9mo ago

   Wild that you claim others misunderstand art via an ill conceived attribution to "thing-ness", but make all of your arguments on the grounds of said "thing-ness". Duchamp's R Mutt is an abstract commentary. The actu
5. 5.▲
   by hiddeninplain 9mo ago

   > This technique allowed him to mass-produce images, echoing the consumer culture he sought to critique and celebrate. Critique, yes. Celebrate, wat? I tend to categorize Warhol as an artist that if you hate their work you should love i