hhm

35 ms·

391.
Rise of the rat-brained robots(technology.newscientist.com)
3 points by hhm 18y ago|0 comments
392.
by hhm 18y ago
I think we need high quality science posts, not any ones. I think we used to have some of those.
393.
Breaking a Vigenère Cipher(ics.uci.edu)
2 points by hhm 18y ago|0 comments
394.
Some of the Microsoft Interview Process Filmed(sellsbrothers.com)
1 points by hhm 18y ago|0 comments
395.
by hhm 18y ago
Thank you! Sure, I'll keep submitting whatever I find interesting in the little time I have.
396.
by hhm 18y ago
Yes, it might be true. I guess it depends on how you present yourself for doing the sell.
397.
by hhm 18y ago
Yes, but who'd you rather be? The idle developer that obviously needs the job so is going to be cheaper, or the more expensive and busy one? That's the successful one afaik.
398.
by hhm 18y ago
Hmmm... I think you are right in some way. However you'll probably agree with me that you are going to think that a developer that hasn't to go after you is probably more successful than the one that does. Of course you'll need to do networ
399.
Platonic Solids in All Dimensions(math.ucr.edu)
5 points by hhm 18y ago|0 comments
400.
by hhm 18y ago
That's good for starting, but not for big contracts, as it shows you as an idle developer, and that isn't good for bargaining in my opinion.
401.
by hhm 18y ago
Cool, you're welcome! Uncertain Principles is cool too; from all these, go through the links and you'll probably find a few more.
402.
by hhm 18y ago
I guess people will be interested in NickB's News.
403.
by hhm 18y ago
Yes, I follow these too. Others are: The Unapologetic Mathematician, The Reference Frame (if you can filter the hating), Symmetry Breaking, Gowers's Weblog, Plus Magazine (sometimes), Not Even Wrong, Cosmic Variance, Backreaction... also so
404.
Group Theory via Rubik’s Cube(geometer.org)
5 points by hhm 18y ago|1 comments
405.
by hhm 18y ago
Thanks a lot for the link.
406.
by hhm 18y ago
Good to know... and now I'll try to be careful with that too.
407.
by hhm 18y ago
There are some interesting blogs to follow though... Terry Tao's, and Scott Aaronson's are two examples: they can be very technical, but when they are more focused in the general public, they are great.
408.
Quantum mechanics and Tomb Raider(terrytao.wordpress.com)
7 points by hhm 18y ago|0 comments
409.
by hhm 18y ago
Well, I guess we can discuss whether science is one of the main themes or not here... In my own pov, science is not only inherently related to technology, but also it's a common interest of everyone I know that works on high tech. Not so su
410.
by hhm 18y ago
That's my point with posting this here. I don't want to complain, but I want to make the correct people aware of this (if they weren't already). What I think is: 1) interesting enough science articles go to the front page when they are post
411.
by hhm 18y ago
No, I didn't do such analysis, but I think the difference is quite evident (even if it wasn't 50/50, sure there was a drop).
412.
by hhm 18y ago
Well, that's exactly why I mentioned not being a native speaker... I do that kind of mistake (and less subtle ones too), and I don't want you to think that I'm just ignorant or something.
413.
by hhm 18y ago
About the bar, I think that while it's certainly higher for science than for programming articles, it has dropped a lot for programming & startups so I don't understand why people is so incredibly picky with science (even for good arti
414.
by hhm 18y ago
"which means Microsoft had more revenue and nearly twice the net profit of Apple and Google combined" Wow, I thought Google was having more profit than Microsoft already. Why is everyone pointing Microsoft as dead and Google as the leader t
415.
by hhm 18y ago
And how do you deal with it? What do you feel? I think that while engineering has a limit for how beautiful it can get, maths is much more nature-like in this regard.
416.
Ask HN: why do we have less science related posts now that in the past?
32 points by hhm 18y ago|51 comments
417.
Beyond Nash: Computer Science and Game Theory(multiagent.com)
3 points by hhm 18y ago|0 comments
418.
GWEI - Google Will Eat Itself(gwei.org)
41 points by hhm 18y ago|13 comments
419.
by hhm 18y ago
Thank you, that's useful.
420.
About AI and neural networks(codeflow.wordpress.com)
20 points by hhm 18y ago|2 comments

More ›