hgoel

13 ms·

361.
by hgoel 6mo ago
And you’re not as skeptical of this claim?
362.
by hgoel 6mo ago
He wouldn't want to be accused of actually believing in anything
363.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I think this is just a tough spot for any of these kinds of companies to be in. It's easy to suggest that they should just ban or allow filtering out AI content, but the problem isn't that easy to deal with. Adding a manual "
364.
by hgoel 6mo ago
"several times the speed of sound" is obviously just meant to mean really fast to earthlings in relation to their speed of sound.
365.
by hgoel 6mo ago
It's genuinely so ridiculous to suggest that freedom and meritocracy (among other things) were why America was able to do this first. This stuff was before the civil rights act. There are endless stories about Americans being sent to
366.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I think it's useful to consider that NVIDIA bet on CUDA early, they've supported it since 2006. AMD has to do a lot less work, but it's still going to take a while to get all of the software in a competitive state. Though, on
367.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I think it's about if there's a possibility of it being zero. Of course there's no way to tell at compile time that a value will definitely be zero. So, in pseudocode int div(int a, int b): return a / b; Would probably b
368.
by hgoel 6mo ago
Presumably an analyzer that makes it an error to not have an immediately traceable zero check. C# can do something similar with null references. It can require you to indicate which arguments and variables are capable of being null, and the
369.
by hgoel 6mo ago
The context window also limits how deeply the model can "think", and it does this in natural language. So a language suited to LLMs would have balanced density, if it's too dense, the model spends many tokens working through
370.
by hgoel 6mo ago
When I was still dependent on my parents, I was stuck with a pretty outdated PC, but was allowed to get a PSP and then a PS Vita (but also only 1 game ever). The reasoning was that a separate console could be taken away easily if my grades
371.
by hgoel 6mo ago
The consequences to everyone that isn't as well fed as yourself are also good for you morally?
372.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I'd like to believe that people have a bit more in mind for children's entertainment than just overstimulating their developing visual and auditory cortices for 8 hours a day.
373.
by hgoel 6mo ago
The responses to this seem unnecessarily hyperbolic. These tests are interesting even with the understanding that the AI is just reciprocating its training. It doesn't matter if the model is conscious or self aware if it still goes off
374.
by hgoel 6mo ago
It's better at holding their attention, but is it actually better? My impression was that a lot of the content was effectively "attention slop", bright colors and noises, often with very little sense to them, or just variatio
375.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I've been all over the place with my thoughts, so it's fair for you to be unsure of how to parse what I said. When making my initial post, I was thinking "this is a coding model, it isn't an image/3d model generatio
376.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I literally said I understand if the training data sourcing is their primary concern.
377.
by hgoel 6mo ago
Regarding generative images, it's more of an issue because the effects are different. Software tends to be a "living" project, so just vibe coding with 0 software knowledge is not yet fully sustainable for maintaining a proje
378.
by hgoel 6mo ago
Yeah, I can understand being upset with their work being stolen to train these models. Anthropic doesn't seem to be working on image/video generation, but they are still training on text-based creative works of questionable sourci
379.
by hgoel 6mo ago
That's a strange position to take. I can understand not wanting models that have been trained on questionably sourced data, but otherwise they're opposing essentially a UX change, not based on UX concerns but on ideological fears.
380.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I don't really get the backlash about Blender here, this isn't generative art, it's basically a natural language means of scripting blender. This feels like the proper way to have AI act as a tool to make artist's jobs e
381.
by hgoel 6mo ago
How well does this hold up in terms of legal scrutiny when previous actions indicate that the Pentagon would retaliate against Google if they didn't accept this "lawful use only" farce? Could Google back out of this agreement
382.
by hgoel 6mo ago
Yeah, I can imagine that it's tricky to find a balance when so many new things are put together. I didn't have the benefit of skilled teachers or parents that believed in my interests (and of course no LLMs!) so I didn't have
383.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I was thinking about it differently. I understood the potential harm on paper, but I think I was still pretty immature. I thought I would be willing to put aside morals (eg working for companies like Palantir) to work on interesting cutting
384.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I agree with the points made, even if personally I am okay with LLMs (as long as they're used with appropriate caution). Especially relevant for students I think, since they are hurting themselves most by relying on LLMs. Just like how
385.
by hgoel 6mo ago
In my computer engineering undergrad ~8 years ago in the US, an ethics class was mandatory, but IIRC the CS curriculum did not have it, despite both leading to similar careers. My memory may be wrong though. Edit: they do seem to have one n
386.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I think they're going to have to do a lot to overcome the Musk and Grok poison. Even ChatGPT hasn't had as many lapses as Grok has had.
387.
by hgoel 6mo ago
Did he really? X is constantly more buggy than Twitter ever was. Right now they have a bug where post appears duplicated as a reply to itself (you can tell it's a bug because liking one automatically likes the other).
388.
by hgoel 6mo ago
Is "employ some critical thinking" supposed to involve being an annoying uptight cynic?
389.
by hgoel 6mo ago
I think they mean to secure your most valuable accounts with a hardware token rather than in a normal password manager, so they aren't at risk if your password manager has an issue.
390.
by hgoel 6mo ago
>Why do you need one? Automation reasons? OpenClaw? This is an attractive way for an attacker to get ALL your passwords in your vault. I need one because I am not always using a graphical interface. What exactly in a GUI do you think mak

More ›