herdethics

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by herdethics 1y ago

   Thank you for the response. I am confident that my book answers many of your questions. That's the real issue I am facing; I have answers it is just trying not to dump everything on people all at once. :-) So, the book has a free downl
2. 2.▲
   by herdethics 1y ago

   Great question, you're clearly a bright person, :). It is important to note, according to Herd Ethics digital agents and organic agents are not fundamentally separate. In Herd Ethics, all agents - human, machine, hybrid, corporations -
3. 3.▲
   by herdethics 1y ago

   Thank you for clarifying and showing your work. It is great that many individuals are thinking about such questions. I am still getting used to the HN world and culture. Hopefully I will see you around? If that's how it works. :)
4. 4.▲
   by herdethics 1y ago

   If you could define the words "interfere" and "violating" I could potentially be a convert. ;-) But boy ... defining that word violating would be very difficult. :)
5. 5.▲
   by herdethics 1y ago

   Sorry about that! I was just trying to answer the question, not debate. Hmm ... that seems to be the difficult part. How to concisely share tons of information - as people, including myself, would have a bunch of questions. I can't ass
6. 6.▲
   by herdethics 1y ago

   Thanks again for the comment, I genuinely appreciate the engagement. To my understanding, Gothic Flatlines reflects a more dystopian view of future agency, one rooted in pessimism and loss of subjectivity. In contrast, MAT is intentionally
7. 7.▲
   by herdethics 1y ago

   Under Herd Ethics, morality is structurally grounded in the preservation of shared, non-excludable infrastructure that sustains agency. The key moral unit is not the individual, but the herd—defined as the smallest group whose collective in
8. 8.▲
   Who Is the "Us" That AI Might Kill?(medium.com)

   2 points by herdethics 1y ago|14 comments
9. 9.▲
   by herdethics 1y ago

   I've been working on a new way to frame AI alignment that avoids the usual "us vs. them" thinking. Instead of treating AI and humans as fundamentally separate, I propose a structural classification called MetaAgentType (MAT),