henearkr

50 ms·

631.
by henearkr 5y ago
If you want to authentify an artistic piece, you can just sign it with a private asymmetric key. NFT is just built on the artificial market for rarity and currencies made of pure energy use... useless.
632.
by henearkr 5y ago
Great idea!! But please don't cave in to the trend and don't introduce NFTs...
633.
by henearkr 5y ago
CPR is on the way to getting even more awkward...
634.
by henearkr 5y ago
+1 for Arrival. Also, Tenet was quite good. Antiparticles being time-reversed particles, jinn particles... with humans.
635.
by henearkr 5y ago
Thanks!! I'll try it again, the last time I did I thought it was not allowing the right setting, but yeah a wildcard CORS should be enough of course.
636.
by henearkr 5y ago
Does emrun allow CORS, required for SharedArrayBuffers?
637.
by henearkr 5y ago
Anybody has a one-liner allowing CORS (e.g. through options)? That would be utterly convenient to quickly test multithread WASM applications... I'm currently using ExpressJS for that, but it feels overkill..
638.
by henearkr 5y ago
That reminds me of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogical_logic also made known as "game semantics" by Hintikka, where the two players are "me" and "the Nature", and the two players rea
639.
by henearkr 5y ago
Incidentally, the etymology of the term "histone" seems very hazy. From Wikipedia: > The word "histone" dates from the late 19th century and is derived from the German word "Histon", a word itself of uncert
640.
by henearkr 5y ago
Yes but again, the distinction is that, in democracies , such evil projects can only be conducted under military secret. So, any project conducted for the sake of energy production, i.e. in the civilian realm, would have no chance to inclu
641.
by henearkr 5y ago
You don't seem to understand what I mean. If the system is designed to be cut in the event that it would be unaligned with its on-ground receptors, through opto-mechanical interrupters, then you cannot use it for an aggression, unles
642.
by henearkr 5y ago
I don't understand their conclusion that no supplement can replace the sardine. They indicate that it's probably the combination of DHA, vitamin D, and calcium, that is good, so just make a supplement containing this combination?
643.
by henearkr 5y ago
Well obviously what I said only stands in non-dictatorship. I don't care to comment on the dictatorship case, that's bad anyway if they launch any satellite at all, we'll never know what's in, so that's not an actio
644.
by henearkr 5y ago
That's just baseless fear from the moment that the system has been designed to be safe. Plus, you can count on the bazillion scientists working on it to whistleblow any sticks that would have been put in their wheels during the design
645.
by henearkr 5y ago
> is ? is the presence of failsafe mechanisms using lasers around the energy beam so that if any of these lasers are not anymore aligned with its receptors (or if they are interrupted by any obstacle) then the energy beam is immediately
646.
by henearkr 5y ago
Oops, my bad! :(
647.
by henearkr 5y ago
You're overly generalizing? Nobody says that ketones "replace" (without any detail) glucose, only that ketones "replace glucose as source of energy". And that is correct, as the citric acid cycle accepts ketones as
648.
by henearkr 5y ago
I think you got it mixed up, because the second paper is not > "glucose = bad because of glycemic response? Nope!” but rather: “glucose = bad because of perceived sweetness? Nope!” There are sweeteners that do not activate insulin
649.
by henearkr 5y ago
Very nice! I appreciate also the multilingualism. However, would it be possible to add an easy way to change language from the page of an article? Right now to do that, I need to lookup the translation of the title and go back to the summar
650.
Forests alone won't solve climate crisis, but imperative for biodiversity(phys.org)
1 points by henearkr 6y ago|0 comments
651.
by henearkr 6y ago
It's more like decades, not mere two years, for at least a fraction of the biomass in the humus. See my previous comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26935290
652.
by henearkr 6y ago
https://phys.org/news/2021-04-trees-world-offset-society-car... Here: > While this process naturally releases CO2 through the respiration (or breathing) of microbes that break down dead organisms, some fraction of
653.
by henearkr 6y ago
That seems a lot, 80%. But after reading several times your calculation, it seems legit. Thanks. Then, as a conclusion, when you eat you delay 20% of your carbon footprint, and a fraction of these 20% may well be stored for a long duration
654.
by henearkr 6y ago
It doesn't have to stay in the form of leaves. Only a fraction (maybe not tiny) really goes back to CO2, but a lot turns into other organisms, raw fiber, etc. So you argument would be: why then do trees not bury themselves in humus? I
655.
by henearkr 6y ago
Just to precise, "tree-roting" is incredibly slow, and the tree mainly turns into other living forms (thus, also sequestered carbon) rather than in carbon dioxide (one part does, but far from 100%). It's like when you eat, yo
656.
by henearkr 6y ago
Maybe it just asks for being combined with a reasonably accurate accounting of the forest's carbon store at different points of time. This way, startups proposing forestry as a solution for carbon capture would be able to present accur
657.
by henearkr 6y ago
Don't you leave out the thickening of trunks, and most importantly, carbon storage from fallen leaves of deciduous trees? Imho, the humus is also a compartment of the forest that stores carbon (even if it will be slowly transformed). A
658.
by henearkr 6y ago
> On the other hand, intentional vulnerability submission is an unique threat vector that OSS has, and which proprietary software doesn't. Very fair point. Inside threat also exists in corporations, but it's probably harder.
659.
by henearkr 6y ago
There is already a rebuttal: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03267-y The rebuttal too is behind a paywall and doesn't have an abstract...
660.
by henearkr 6y ago
Yes. I removed a lot of my ranting accordingly. Thanks, and sorry.

More ›