5 ms·
There is already a rebuttal: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03267-y https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03267-y The rebuttal too is behind
by henearkr 6y ago
There is already a rebuttal:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03267-y https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03267-y
The rebuttal too is behind a paywall and doesn't have an abstract...
- sp332 6y agoI think the link is to the rebuttal, right? The original paper is from 2008.
- sampo 6y ago2008: Original article [1] 2021: Rebuttal of the 2008 article [2] 2021: same issue of Nature, next 2 pages: Rebuttal of the rebuttal by 6 (out of 8) of the authors of the 2008 article [3] [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/nature07276 https://www.nature.com/articles/nature07276 [2] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03266-z https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03266-z [3] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03267-y https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03267-y
- fshbbdssbbgdd 6y agoI’m curious if these competing rebuttals get to read each other during the editing process. Otherwise will there be two more rebuttals in the next issue?