Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
henearkr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
361.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
He meant formed not forged . The formed top covers are thick aluminium foils that are folded by machines. They did show signs of lack of rigidity in the usage of the laptops (it was shipped with the first Framework laptops, and later rep
362.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Experts in drilling oil wells do not have an extended knowledge on Earth's climate mechanisms, and usually they don't even make reports about this subject. When they do, it is seen suspiciously because it is not their domain of ex
363.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Yeah it's a little bit like saying that Copernicus was lying about the Solar System. In the end, the aim of the Daily Sceptic seems more to undermine and weaken (by discrediting them) the ways of action that exist to address the curren
364.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
> they still don't exhibit the level of consciousness and intelligence you had been purporting But they do, on social tasks, only the insects use much simpler cues, whereas octopuses, humans, etc, use social cues that they have to p
365.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
A/ "Scientific consensus" means that the specialists of the subject overwhelmingly agree, and moreover they give a high statistical confidence in their conclusion (because, yes, they also quantify certainty/uncertainty).
366.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Will it be possible to buy and use these new audio components to improve a standard FrameWork? In the Markeplace I can see the new speakers but not the new audio board (or is the codec actually on the motherboard?).
367.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
The one with "researcher" title is one of those who spent most of their life learning about the subject, comparing and simulating different theories, and weighing the odds using statistical models, which by the way is also why the
368.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
If they attack positions that are widely recognized as scientific consensuses, then they clearly are NOT pro-science. I'd say further, the clearest sign that somebody or some organisation is not listening to science, is that they are a
369.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Science is knowledge on a subject, boosted by the use of logic. Once you see that, very hard not to be pro-it.
370.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
The tone of the article is "ohlolo Bill Gates is evil, look at how he is the one who finances thus controls the WHO", which is false, as this financial contribution gives him ZERO control on it. Yet it is implied in the tone of th
371.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Probably the same kind of people who replied to me "and so what is bad about nationalism?" a few weeks ago on HN...
372.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
"Oh look!! He knew there would be a pandemic!!" So you see where is the conspiracy theory in that, now?
373.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
I'm just not sad about it lol, that's all. I agree with the "big principle" that they should have access to basic internet services, in theory. But I also think that there should be laws forbidding anti-science and consp
374.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
It's actively propagating conspiracy theories, denialism of anthropogenic global warming, fear of vaccines, distrust of health authorities... This is very harmful for everybody who read it without a critical mind (i.e. exactly the publ
375.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Just look at their front page: it's full of AGW denialism and anti-ecologism, conspiracy theories (e.g. Bill Gates and global health...), use of terms like "covid propaganda", ...
376.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
The Daily Sceptic is such a piece of shit, I try very hard to feel sad but I can't. I know that it's a question of big principles etc... but still.
377.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
> Tons of insects use deception tactics No, read better: "[...] in a specific social context amenable to cheating 39 per cent of the time, while it was never employed in other social contexts" It's completely different fro
378.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Yes. But such complex program is still years away...
379.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Consciousness in itself is an empty word, there are many definitions of it, and, most importantly, each definition equates it to a set of properties that you can test separately. Such tests show that some arthropods rank high on the scale o
380.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
There are tons of sources if you just type anything in Google, but here is just a snack as an example: octopuses recognize individual people: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20563906/ There are also articles about how
381.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Just to give you a blow of reality check, an octopus is considered as least as smart (including sociability and all) as a cat. If not even more, considering its capacity for problem-solving. I see intelligence/consciousness as orthogon
382.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
You'd be surprised by the level of consciousness of e.g. octopuses.
383.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Wasps are fascinating smart, eusocial animals. We should study them, admire them, but not kill or eat them. Yeah for the record I'm vegan.
384.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
The mass of hobby miners NOT running at a datacenter-scale was probably enough to empty stores, which was the point of the original comment.
385.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
A ton of not-data-center-people took mining as a hobby...
386.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
In a near future they could easily go for a very simple solution which is to provide expansion cards featuring multiple connectors (or storage etc) at a time.
387.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Actually, maybe good consequences. Lithium presence in drinking water (from natural sources) has been linked to lower crimes rate, suicides rate, and is acting as a mood stabilizer.
388.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Thanks!!
389.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Thanks a lot for the information!! But for now, as my Finnish is still very poor (but I'm learning), I rely a lot on the Helsinki Times to get news about Finland.
390.
▲
by
henearkr
4y ago
Yes, it's very fishy. All those identifiers prefixed by "ez", in the HTML as well as in the scripts, is it some kind of signature?
More ›