Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hendersoon
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Pinterest uses different domains for every country so you'd need to add around a dozen qualifiers to get the big ones excluded.
62.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Determine the type of behavior that likely indicates a server is shared with many different people, which should be extremely easy, then send that user a series of warnings culminating in banning their Plex account if they don't comply
63.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
If anything it's underhyped, in that the technology will be foundational to how we do work and sort through tremendous data volumes in the future. The pushback is simply that these giant companies haven't found any clear way to mo
64.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Yes, it's become an arms race. However it seems like it's one YouTube can't win, due to some limitation in their process flow. You'd think it would be trivial, just don't send the video if the user hadn't first
65.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
I know it's generally accepted that "the guy on the street" doesn't care about privacy, but honestly this seems a step too far even for such accepting souls. I guess Musk superfans may go for it, but everybody else? Just
66.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Kind of a brilliant compromise, actually. By default it's a declarative content-blocker, but if you run into a specific site that shows ads you can enable the full-fat uBlock Origin featureset there.
67.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
So it's just the TOR browser with TOR disabled? Thing is, you could do that anyway. It did take setting a couple environment variables, no GUI method, but easy enough to do. Unclear what value Mullvad's version provides. Feels lik
68.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Hopefully this fails in the inevitable litigation. I could come up with 5 better solutions off the top of my head. Luddite politicians, sigh.
69.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Yep, used proximitron for adblocking for many years, then switched to admuncher (system-wide low-level adblocking for Windows) and then to uBlock Origin for browsers in conjunction with AdGuard Home DNS-based adblocking for my entire LAN. P
70.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
I don't necessarily think his plan to turn Twitter into WeChat for the west is /doomed/ to fail, although it seems highly unlikely to gain traction, but it's certainly a bold plan to turn the flailing social network arou
71.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Looking past the Elon hilarity, I'm all for moonshots, a bold move investing in the next big thing. Trying to transform Twitter into WeChat for the west seems unlikely, to say the least, but has nothing to do with this announcement. Th
72.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Strongly disagree. Multi-line rows in particular have been missing from Thunderbird (and ONLY Thunderbird) for 20 years. That is not an exaggeration, Outlook had them 20 years ago. People expected this feature, 20 years ago. I myself posted
73.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
I have engaged with it. They definitely aren't receptive and development moves excruciatingly slowly, but I wouldn't attribute that to being negative so much as strictly limited resources. Thunderbird is what it is; if you find it
74.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
After 20 years I'm still amazed they finally got multi-row listings working. I honestly never thought I'd see the day. New Thunderbird development is glacially slow, but to their credit they have kept the software functional and
75.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
LXD is fantastic software, makes spinning up VM-like containers extremely easy. I used it for several years before moving to proxmox for a more mature manageable solution. Agree it would be vastly more popular and interesting if it didn
76.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
From my own company, I can definitively say that even if Alma/Rocky don't figure out a way to continue providing quick updates, we certainly won't start paying for RHEL. Discussion is ongoing right now between Debian, SuSE, a
77.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Speak for yourself, I blocked TV ads since 1999 when I bought a TiVo series 1.
78.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Much longer than that! The first really user-hostile move was pop-up ads, then pop-UNDER ads, which were just offensively intrusive, so bad that all the browsers stopped them. Then the advertising industry started to innovate, and it became
79.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Nobody knows why some people are obese and some aren't. It may start with willpower and then reinforce metabolism, sure. Or maybe you caught a virus when you were two years old that disposed you to be fat for life. Or for whatever reas
80.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Semaglutide costs around $300/month in Canada; that is the "right price", for now anyway. In the US it retails around $1200/month due to insurance company shenanigans. What we need in the US is a) Medicare/medicaid
81.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Obviously that is true, but that isn't how insurance companies think. Imagine you're an obese 45 year old man working in a professional white collar job. You'll likely continue working for another 20+ years and switch jobs 1-
82.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
It is absolutely magical, and I can say based on extensive blood work and a MRI that the changes were extraordinarily beneficial for me, personally. "Unhealthy weight loss" is a stupid phrase. When you're morbidly obese and l
83.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
It won't get worse, that was my point. These peptides work. REALLY work. They just need to get cheaper. Another poster noted that it takes much longer to approve medications for children, so my 5 year prediction may well have been wild
84.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
They aren't approved /yet/, no. They do not require injections, there's a formulation already approved called Rybelsus that doesn't. Tirzepatide is roughly equivalent to gastric bypass. Most (not all) people that st
85.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
This study doesn't consider the very recent advent of weight loss medications that actually no-BS work, like semaglutide and tirzepatide. They're way too expensive right now but that will absolutely change. I wouldn't be surp
86.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
They totally did, as did many other acquired companies, but (AFAIK) Github didn't have "we won't sell your data" as a core tenet of the company carried off the mountaintop inscribed on stone tablets like Google. I'm
87.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Same. I'm honestly shocked they're getting rid of the service. It's core infrastructure, cheap as chips to run, and binds people to using Google. Same reason why Microsoft hosts domains. You have your mail, storage, office su
88.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
I'm looking forward to a bright future when NVMe drives are competitive with magnetic disks and we can all afford to put 12 of 'em in a tiny silent box like this for blazing fast local storage. It'll happen! Also, bravo to As
89.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Yes, I would prefer that. Give a year of notice then turn off the service. I can choose where to send my business next. And I am, I'm moving to Cloudflare. It's a superior service anyway and they support my TLDs. I never bothered
90.
▲
by
hendersoon
3y ago
Squarespace is giving Google money, and in exchange they're getting my personal information so they can bill me. That seems extremely clear-cut. Not sure if you're talking about some obscure legality interpretation but in plain sp
More ›