hellosire

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hellosire 6y ago

   > As it happens I have seen articles in SPIE that do have a similar flavour: a well-established existing area of mathematics that has been re-"discovered" in a more limited form in another context without acknowledgement. Again
2. 2.▲
   by hellosire 6y ago

   I would be happy to see if you have any citations of dubious peer-reviewed articles or conference proceedings to the extent of the infamous Tsai integration paper. The idea that you overreach on the veracity of journals from the SPIE is jus
3. 3.▲
   by hellosire 6y ago

   I'm not sure why you mention off-topic GPT3. If you are trying to imply editors will accept GPT3 written papers somehow now or in the future, then that is completely false, disingenuous, and not based on reality at all. There is no nee
4. 4.▲
   by hellosire 6y ago

   Sorry, but that is dead wrong. SPIE is not a predatory journal and is considered seriously internationally and is one of the counterparts to OSA. I work in this field.