hello_moto

9 ms·

91.
by hello_moto 2y ago
This is how bad rich people win: don't pay up, fight in court with their legals that is already in the payroll.
92.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Technically Americans collectively (as a nation with specific values and culture) made this happened. Democrats are run by Corporates. Americans love capitalism and would brand anything else (even by a slight mentioned of certain aspect) a
93.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Next admin a socialist? Hold my beer sez Oligarchs.
94.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Pretty clear the answer is the hi-tech industry.
95.
by hello_moto 2y ago
The children of older generation will have even bigger mortgage, limiting their economy movement. This is what an eroding middle class looks like. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42795925 Building more housing won&#x27
96.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Sudden tariff on stable trade agreement that has been tweaked to ensure both side won is not fear mongering. Fear mongering is what Trump does to Americans: take out Oil, the thing that Americans have never ending hunger for because US infr
97.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Uh... Ya just like GDP going up is good for the nation ignoring GDP hides distribution and wealth inequality goes up unchecked. Average sucks.
98.
by hello_moto 2y ago
lol, this is just "paper" justification just like the whole Military plane debacle with LatAm countries. Eventually Colombia still reject Military plane deporting immigrants, just like how Mexico said "Fuck you" when Tru
99.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Uh this isn't about Trudeau. This is about Trump wanting to replace the deficit from him fleecing US tax revenue to be distributed to the billionaires as Tax Cut. He needs to replenish some from another source: Tariff, which is a form
100.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Tariff is a legal tool, I give you that. Trump's tariff on the other hand doesn't have justification. He uses Drugs as an excuse to get his tariff unchallenged. Trump also wants to use revenue Tariff to cover the tax revenue defic
101.
by hello_moto 2y ago
That is what eroding middle class looks like. This is what happened when The Rich outcompetes the middle class.
102.
by hello_moto 2y ago
The rich that I refer here is Funds, REITs, or small group of Investors. All of them are financed by the Rich. > then lessened the amount of housing so that there's not enough for future generations. NIMBY definitely another issue b
103.
by hello_moto 2y ago
You're tied to your job though. Not so in say, UK, Canada.
104.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Technically multiple bombs explode here and there. Here's how: * Family bought 1 house (assets), big mortgage (cause it's expensive), live until retirement * Parents sell the house (lost the assets) to either a wealthier family or
105.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Housing costs are both created by NIMBY and The Rich gobbling assets both Residential _AND_ Commercials. Here's the thing: if housing cost goes up but wage goes up as well (wage is controlled by the Rich), then things will be fine. But
106.
by hello_moto 2y ago
$25K is a lot. Respectfully, You're out of touch until you lost your 6 digits job.
107.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Second vacation homes (plus Airbnb) become a problem for locals of that area. The young ones can't survive there and eventually have to rent (or provided as comp package) from established businesses (B&B/hotel).
108.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Likewise in Software. Those A-Tier paygrade is expected to be on-call (24/7 through weekend) no-bonus, lead big projects, review codebases, teach juniors...
109.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Let kids have guns, can drink booze, and smoke too while we're at it?
110.
by hello_moto 2y ago
Then parents all over the world have failed. Even the successful ones have limited shelf life before the kids get isolated from the friends and losing out the actual real world Social Life. The tone of your response signals that you're
111.
by hello_moto 2y ago
For a company of Dropbox stature, "often" they target the people that get paid the most. There are rationales behind it. The simplest one is that the product is matured enough so you don't need these so-called 10x engineers o
112.
by hello_moto 2y ago
I was lucky (and blessed) that I also realized this early on. I was an idealist, following best practices, learning the language to the dot until I stumbled upon a different enjoyment in work: mentoring, guiding, helping, cheering co-worker
113.
by hello_moto 2y ago
In this job market? Damn, where's common sense and logic?
114.
by hello_moto 2y ago
> Simply switching the name and keeping the slug - and thus the 2+million sites - should be thought of as theft. He probably is trying to make a point what WPEngine is doing (based on his own perspective)
115.
by hello_moto 2y ago
There are publicly listed hi-tech companies that may not be that big...
116.
by hello_moto 2y ago
>which worked for them at 500+ engineers, but made no sense for smaller companies The number of hi-tech companies that grew from 37signals size to Uber size have also increased due to various reasons: SaaS becoming more and more accepted
117.
by hello_moto 2y ago
People never fully adopted Ruby for Ruby sake. People adopted Ruby because of Rails. Another more adopted Ruby software are probably fluentD and maybe Jekyll. The rest kind of comes and goes. Majority sys-admin toolings have always been dom
118.
by hello_moto 2y ago
> people just went back by being productive building modular "monolithic" architectures, and using "microservices" only when absolutely necessary. The number of hi-tech companies that are in the middle-to-large scale
119.
by hello_moto 2y ago
It's DHH marketing style (it sez right there in his earlier book: pick a fight). Back when Rails burst into the scene, he picked the EJB mountain to battle and positioned Rails vs EJB for as long as he could. This is another battle in
120.
by hello_moto 2y ago
I'd challenge you to be a CISO :) You don't want to be in a situation where you're taken hostage and asked hundred mills ransomeware just because you're too slow to mitigate the situation.

More ›