Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
helaoban
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
1.
▲
by
helaoban
4mo ago
Nope, Ive's firm also designed the exterior.
2.
▲
by
helaoban
6mo ago
>Our presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok is not an endorsement [...] We stay because the people on those platforms deserve access to information, too. We stay because some of our most-read posts are the ones criticizing
3.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
This makes no sense. The vast majority of driving is not being done for pleasure.
4.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
>Another culture clash, this time between Discovery’s unscripted empire and Warner’s premium sensibilities, a wannabe mogul overpaying so he could cosplay as Robert Evans (ask Claude), and a 5x debt-to-EBITDA ratio. The good news? The se
5.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
So now heads of state are fair game for unilateral elimination without a declaration of war This should be fun.
6.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
"Trump Rolls the Dice on Regime Change" (1) What a headline. Anybody else have this on their election day bingo card? Midterms should be a blood bath though, right? Right? (insert Anakin meme). 1. https://www.wsj.com&#x
7.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
If you instigate a war you are responsible for all casualties.
8.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
I like Special Military Operation better.
9.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
Does the term landslide have a widely accepted definition? One definition could be winning every single swing state, which Trump did. I think you also have to factor in the degree of political polarization today, and in particular Trump
10.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
If you want to challenge a point, then challenge it. Don't cower behind ambiguous snark.
11.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
If that is the case, you have to explain why right wing propagandists have been so much more successful than left wing ones.
12.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
I think any such examination of a military that doesn't actually fight wars is meaningless. The question can only be really asked of a handful of countries.
13.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
Pedantry. The Department of War was responsible for naval affairs until The Department of the Navy was spun off from it in 1798, and aerial forces until the creation of the The Department of the Air Force in 1947, whereafter it was left wit
14.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
Easiest $2.8 billion made in history?
15.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
The question of whether or not the government should be able to use AI for targeting without the involvement of humans is a wartime question, since that is the only time the military should be killing people. Under such a scenario, requisit
16.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
All of these problems are downstream of the Congress having thoroughly abdicated its powers to the executive. The military should be reigned in at the legislative level, by constraining what it can and cannot do under law. Popular action is
17.
▲
by
helaoban
7mo ago
It SHOULD be called the Department of War, as it was originally, since it makes its function clear. We are a society that has euphemized everything and so we no longer understand anything.
18.
▲
by
helaoban
1y ago
Shouldn't the burden of proof belong to those that claim that regulation isn't the cost, when it is so extremely obvious to anybody who has ever had to build anything that it is? Just look at building costs in California vs Texas.
19.
▲
by
helaoban
1y ago
this is so cool
20.
▲
by
helaoban
1y ago
Can we pause and admire the sheer contagiousness of the debate? We are now extending it to the meta-realm, discussing the possible mental states that led to one or more of the original participants adopting certain lines of reasoning...
21.
▲
by
helaoban
1y ago
What did we do to our world.
22.
▲
by
helaoban
2y ago
Sigh, when will people stop reaching for Hitler / Mussolini analogies to explain every political development they witness in their lives? It really is a remarkable achievement by the propaganda departments of the victors of the 2nd wor
23.
▲
by
helaoban
2y ago
> Still, wouldn't her detention be arbitrary and thus fall foul of habeas corpus principles which I have no doubt are in the US law? That's for a court to determine, and I'm sure it takes several weeks at least for somethi
24.
▲
by
helaoban
2y ago
Yes, I think it's a generally rare occurrence to be confronted this way about one's belief in God in the US, having lived here most of my life. Perhaps the circumstances warrant it, but I think the statement that the nurse had &qu
25.
▲
by
helaoban
2y ago
I'm sorry, but the article seems to obscure a key fact, which is that she travelled to the US AFTER her initial visa was revoked. It seems dumb to travel to a country that has explicitly revoked your visa without being granted a new on
26.
▲
by
helaoban
2y ago
For what definition of professional or proficiency does one achieve "general professional proficiency" in French in 24 weeks...
27.
▲
New update doesn't let me drag files onto the address bar
(old.reddit.com)
2 points
by
helaoban
3y ago
|
0 comments
28.
▲
by
helaoban
3y ago
Lol. The opposite is true. We live in time when lying to the population has never been more difficult. Before the internet, information control and media capture by the state was near total, and lying to the entire population was the defaul
29.
▲
by
helaoban
3y ago
How do we get a livecam on one of these things.
30.
▲
Otis: Tropical storm to category 5 hurricane in 24h
(nhc.noaa.gov)
85 points
by
helaoban
3y ago
|
22 comments
More ›