hef19898

38 ms·

541.
by hef19898 3y ago
If a continent is your target, sure...
542.
by hef19898 3y ago
Basically everything in comment is factually wrong so... Edit: Nuclear is more expensive than wind and solar, based on auction prices for projects since 2017 (?). Nuclear net capacity gains are miniscule for decades now, and will for decade
543.
by hef19898 3y ago
Just because SpaceX has rockets that go to space doesn't mean those rockets are ICBMs.
544.
by hef19898 3y ago
And the French are the only ones doing that. Also, back when France built its nuclear reactors, climate change and CO2 emissions were nothing people considered or where bothered with. Love it how the only feasible way forward from where w
545.
by hef19898 3y ago
>> Rules for thee, not for me. And you were sooooo close... A pitty, really...
546.
by hef19898 3y ago
Happens all to me all the time, really annoying when you don't want to be cheap on tips...
547.
by hef19898 3y ago
There are detailed diagrams and formulas to calculate that. Engineering, not back of the envelope highschool physics. But guess what, people designing an building power plants know this. And whatever is built is the best compromise possible
548.
by hef19898 3y ago
Because you only hear of the failures. Viaot the SAP homepage to get an idea of who is using it, all of those companies implemented it auccessfully at one point. OP isn't saying the SAP implementation wasn't successful so, just ex
549.
by hef19898 3y ago
If you really drill down the numbers, there are the cibstant 25% or so actively supporting it, regardless of country, with enough others tagging along passively to get the 25% dangerously close to actual power. Interesting times indeed.
550.
by hef19898 3y ago
Yeah, Trump wont drop out unless he dies. He desperately wants to stay out of prison. And people behind him want to stay in power. Fingers crossed we all dodge a bullet this year. Because if we end up with Presidente Marine Le-Pen, Presiden
551.
by hef19898 3y ago
The upcoming 2024 election cycle will be one for the history books, regardless of outcome. And that outcome can be incredibly bad. I said it before, if Trump gets a second term, he will have a third. And then democracy as we know it in the
552.
by hef19898 3y ago
Regarding 1): This can be avoided by having an agency asking for loans for you, as those requests are not directly linked to you as far as Schufa is concerned. Most of the time so, you can easily ignore Schufa in your dqy to day live. They
553.
by hef19898 3y ago
It generally helps to no use hunches when it comes to hard technical questions.
554.
by hef19898 3y ago
I don't know!!!?!!!? You think I just had a streak of genius?
555.
by hef19898 3y ago
And you cannot empty the river neither, especially during a drought, can you?
556.
by hef19898 3y ago
What are you saying? That Earth's rotation axis is, what, tilted? Outragious! Herasy!
557.
by hef19898 3y ago
You do know that 6-7 GW per year are close to nothing compared to new wind and solar, not to mention other plants, China is installing? Nor is it in the general picture.
558.
by hef19898 3y ago
And now imagine how that stuff would work if certification requirements were lower. Regarding China, I thought the same thing. Until Ukraine. Because as it turned out, that being at constant, if low intensity, war for basically all the time
559.
by hef19898 3y ago
French reactors suffered a lack of suffciently cool water, what little water they had was too hot. Cooling towers numbers actually are sufficient.
560.
by hef19898 3y ago
Now imagine you are working in controlling at a power plant operator, and your yearly generated output is 5% lower that whatever plan has before. What do you think would happen? - investors, management and board saying "no biggy, 5% is
561.
by hef19898 3y ago
We are building solar and wind aggressively. The problem with nuclear power is, nobody manages to build it aggressively or even at enough scale to make a meaningfull impact. What we should do, is keeping existing nuclear plants running as
562.
by hef19898 3y ago
You actually have no idea about electricity transmission. For long term problems, look no further than France. Short term, look up how electricity generation, transmission, markets and grid stability are linked. Wikipedia is a good start.
563.
by hef19898 3y ago
Yes, because load factor are long time averages while electricity generation and consumption are almost real time. Kind of like 4D checkers or something.
564.
by hef19898 3y ago
Take a close look at the title again, second word after "solar", you have to pass by "and" to get there.
565.
by hef19898 3y ago
I wanted a rephrased statement, not a dictionary extract. Because I still have no clue what your piont is.
566.
by hef19898 3y ago
An accurate argument would include the financial aspects of +/- 15% in generated output and the impact that has on grid capacity....
567.
by hef19898 3y ago
And now look at number of solar and wind installed vs. nuclear. Take net numbers, as most nuclear capacity replaces decommissioned reactors in countries without a nuclear exit strategy. I am too lazy too look up, and link, those publicly
568.
by hef19898 3y ago
Look at your paycheck, and imagine the number is 15% lower. Should answer the question.
569.
by hef19898 3y ago
Somehow, that is the latest pro-niclear / anti-renewables talking point. Not tgat people in field learn the principle of load factor in one of the first days of 101 lectures on the subject... It least it is an evolution up from "s
570.
by hef19898 3y ago
You are really asking after the explanation above?

More ›