hedders

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hedders 7y ago

   +1 for this. Takes a bit of configuring before you have it all working seemlessly, and it's probably not ready for non-tinkerers - yet - but it's really powerful.
2. 2.▲
   by hedders 7y ago

   Hardly. I mean, it's not like it's difficult for a small business to maintain an art 30 record. Unless it's doing a Cambridge Analytica, of course.
3. 3.▲
   by hedders 7y ago

   The way art 30(5) is drafted though means that the exception applies to basically nobody. What business can, honestly, say that it only occasionally processes personal data? Does it have no employees? Does it only occasionally communicate
4. 4.▲
   by hedders 7y ago

   Nope. But in some jurisdictions consumer protection and data privacy laws ought to prevent FB doing this, their EULA notwithstanding. However, bear in mind that this is from The Telegraph, which is a not a high quality news source. There is
5. 5.▲
   by hedders 7y ago

   Maybe it's naïve. But I don't think it's really aimed at people who have already declined to participate in social media on privacy grounds. Rather, I suspect the idea is to provide an easier way of managing available control