Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
heartbeats
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
I mean, not if they comply judiciously with EU law. It's not like Facebook have been famous for the care with which they have followed all the rules laid upon them.
92.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Yeah, but they'll have way better chances if FB isn't around.
93.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Surely, being literally banned kills the network effects quite quickly? If they sense blood in the water, you'll have Eurobook in a week, and that's that.
94.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
This is not an accurate description of anything. - Traffic analysis only works for a global adversary - Feds would need to control a very sizeable chunk of the network to deanonymize your HS, and you can use your own nodes (also see Vanguar
95.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
There is a very simple way to deal with the agent. Just don't answer any questions. Open the conversation, and then respond with "I want to cancel my subscription", no matter what they ask. If they ask if you want some other
96.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
But if you zoom in, it looks the same.
97.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
The easy way to do this is to just connect with netcat and send it from your home IP. If it violates SPF, it is all but certain to go into spam.
98.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Sites hosted behind Tor do not reveal your external IP address.
99.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
These companies are providing critical infrastructure. If I run a business that's dependent on the phone lines and they cut me off, I'm entitled to a hell of a lot more than the monthly fee for my line. There's many businesse
100.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Now, see, I've been using Photoshop (and Premiere, and After Effects, and...) for all my life, and yet I've somehow never had this problem. Haven't had to pay a single cent, in fact. With each new headline like this, I feel m
101.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
(reposting my comment) From my layman's understanding, the process is this: 1. Measure outside interference sources 2. Measure MRI of "nothing" 3. Use ML to estimate f(interference) = noise 4. Subtract estimated noise from si
102.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Sure, but it's not like it has the potential for overfitting. From my layman's understanding, the process is this: 1. Measure outside interference sources 2. Measure MRI of "nothing" 3. Use ML to estimate f(interference)
103.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Why so expensive? Couldn't you just site it way out in the boonies? If you put it on a giant purpose-built concrete cube, it seems like most of this stuff becomes cheaper.
104.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
If I recall correctly, some of the Chromebook models had 3:2 screens so you could get "more web on the screen".
105.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
This is ... not true, though? Consumer goods are more expensive in most of Europe, sure, but that's because of VAT - after adjusting for VAT, the price is usually the same. This makes sense if you consider that customer protection usua
106.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
> the amount of time writing software is almost always going to be dwarfed by the maintenance period for software that makes it to production. Oh sorry, I meant it the other way around! So, I mean, I've seen this in scripts that I w
107.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
It's intentionally built to be crap. If your requirements are constantly changing, you want to be able to turn on a dime. If you have "nicely architected" software, that's going to be a lot of work. If the "software
108.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
In other words, then, China is doing this for no discernible reason, and the US is just being kind in pointing out how they are harming themselves? Why would the US not sponsor terrorists in China? Some separatism would do good to distract
109.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Not if their adversary went from 500M to 200M at the same time.
110.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
You're considering moving because you'd have to spend a day setting up a post box and new analytics? You don't think you're being a wee bit dramatic here, homie?
111.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Google could trivially re-domicile to Ireland if they wanted to. Just do a reverse merger, and have the services within the US provided by Google LLC, which becomes a subsidiary of Google Ireland Limited.
112.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
> That’s the only illegal thing they do What about the cookie popups, with the "accept" vs. "more info" choices? Is that legal, then?
113.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Hetzner, OVH, Leaseweb, Scaleway. How many cloud providers do you need?
114.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Web 3.0 is The Phantom Menace.
115.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
> Launching the nukes would be bad for whoever they blew up, but bad for whoever launched them, too, particularly if whoever they launched them at launched their own. Yes, but it wouldn't hurt them in terms of power . Here's M
116.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
> I don't think we are harvesting them for transplant organs. The organ harvesting stuff is not exactly proven: > According to a unanimous determination by the China Tribunal in May 2020, China has persecuted and medically tested
117.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Well, is it to defend against small, irrelevant third-world countries with a handful of nukes with barely functioning delivery systems, or is it to defend against large, serious places with serious arsenals? Because these are two very diffe
118.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Unlike web1 and web2, web3 is a grift. In contrast, this appears to be a genuinely innovative technology.
119.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
There's no contradiction here. It's obvious that when the U.S. criticizes Chinese behavior, they do it in furtherance of some goal. Since power is a zero-sum game, assuming that it is happening, it follows then that stopping it wo
120.
▲
by
heartbeats
5y ago
Surely, this is not a serious take. For one, NK hardly has the capacity to "destroy" the US - they barely have working ICBMs. Secondly, whatever the amount of nuclear warheads necessary to deter this is, it's surely less than
More ›