headsoup

50 ms·

211.
by headsoup 4y ago
I don't understand what your argument here is? Don't fight technology because it's 'the future?'
212.
by headsoup 4y ago
No, I think "it's going to happen anyway because things happened in the past" is the poor argument. These AI companies are wholesale scraping art without permission, payment or credit. You just have to look at how they act i
213.
by headsoup 4y ago
I like this judge. More of them please. Reminds me of judge Otis T. Wright ( https://floridaiptrends.com/2013/03/12/prenda-law-meet-judge... )
214.
by headsoup 4y ago
Who believes artists and human art isn't going anywhere? So this business art is just replacing art no one was doing, or it was just happening for free somehow? Do you think any of the artists that created the content the AI learns fr
215.
by headsoup 4y ago
The reasonable price comes from not paying any artists to source the learning datasets. Shady use of 'non-profits' to do that but and hope to avoid legal trouble.
216.
by headsoup 4y ago
AI art is completely ripping off actual artists to build their learning datasets. They're datasets are full of copyrighted work but until now no one cares much about visual artists. Take a look at the statements for AI music generati
217.
by headsoup 4y ago
I only guess because renewables don't yet provide a solid base load power guarantee around the clock in all weather types. The obvious solution is not having so much demand, but we all want to have that cake and eat it.
218.
by headsoup 4y ago
The really interesting part would be when winter hits and the Queen stops producing workers to downscale the hive (i.e. mass layoffs), then the insane period in spring where mass hiring starts... Certainly a fun idea to play with
219.
by headsoup 4y ago
VC cash and cheap debt, oodles of it. Workers are reaping the benefits of 'growth.'
220.
by headsoup 4y ago
AA does the latter.
221.
by headsoup 4y ago
Funny that we seem to be heading further away from just admitting 'students' and more into categorisation. Working as intended?
222.
by headsoup 4y ago
It's going to work initially, but I've never seen it have the clause that 'this will result in equality once we hit the correct percentages' or that 'AA will finish at this point' because that second stage is d
223.
by headsoup 4y ago
Do you have a link for that? I'd like to read more into it.
224.
by headsoup 4y ago
To be honest, it's closer than you'd think. I find very few games now that I can't run through Steam+Proton, to the point I forget I'm not on the 'Native' OS for them. And what I've also found is that i
225.
by headsoup 4y ago
It's not a conspiracy theory, it's in the data quite clearly now.
226.
by headsoup 4y ago
I don't think you answered the argument there, merely suggesting it's fine to kick the can down the road because "emergency now!" First, we need to look at where renewables are being used and if they're actually in
227.
by headsoup 4y ago
There are also just as many people stating "renewables will get us there" without any real justification...
228.
by headsoup 4y ago
From the article they describe many ways they can cheat in fishing (e.g. putting ice in that then melts) that aren't so easy to catch. If there is a way to cheat, someone will inevitably give it a go with enough incentives. Cheating i
229.
by headsoup 4y ago
The hard to tell part points to issues in society, not the satire.
230.
by headsoup 4y ago
Is that already illegal? If so, no, if not, yes. Being offensive is not the measure for applying censorship.
231.
by headsoup 4y ago
I don't think a lot of them sucked at all compared to modern games. Forced constraints lead to wonderful creativity and strong - even if simple - game design. Sure the games might not have had as much breadth or depth at times, but I
232.
by headsoup 4y ago
Obviously the biggest advantage of having a CRT again is reliving the glory days of pointing my SNES Super Scope at it and blasting away at Yoshi's Safari, Battle Clash and Metal Combat! They have sad sadly in a box for far too long, I
233.
by headsoup 4y ago
No, they need to fix the systemic issues that allow patent trolls to succeed.
234.
by headsoup 4y ago
Just as naive as 'the 90's was certainly worse.' Were you in Rwanda in '94?
235.
by headsoup 4y ago
Well you might give them a helmet to protect the injured area if serious, so bad example there I'd say.
236.
by headsoup 4y ago
Not to mention anything even slightly political or divisive in nature will quickly become chaos.
237.
by headsoup 4y ago
Pretty much, he just commented on their composure and the crowd cheering, it could have been any event anywhere in that respect.
238.
by headsoup 4y ago
I think madrox is referring to 'good guys' as in Western countries vs China etc, not literal good guys and bad guys. That's a fairly common view, regardless of all the actual bad Western country leaderships' conduct.
239.
by headsoup 4y ago
I think this is a click-bait headline for what is essentially a commentary piece on recent politics. The rally actually had very little to do with the article other than some framing. I think he did a reasonable job raising his issues witho
240.
by headsoup 4y ago
What's a good reference for this? I see it said a lot but are there a few good case studies around to explain it out?

More ›