he0001

27 ms·

271.
by he0001 8y ago
The problem with code ownership is siloing. Because you are the only one who understands the problem domain or “the code” this create dependencies which doesn’t scale. I’d say code ownership is a smell and an indication that your code isn’t
272.
by he0001 8y ago
No easy money. It’s hard to find new useful materials and you have to find an area to use it in, and it’s probably expensive while doing it. It’s easier if you already have a problem to solve than finding a problem that you can solve indire
273.
by he0001 8y ago
They are not equivalent scenarios, which the article explains. The JS one is about asynchronous isolation context while the java one is just a evaluation bug.
274.
by he0001 8y ago
Yes, since GDPR only applies for non-regulated areas where no other law is effective. In the EU government there a bunch of other laws effective which overrides GDPR.
275.
NASA have found organic material on Mars(fortune.com)
2 points by he0001 8y ago|1 comments
276.
by he0001 8y ago
But business’ change and then so does your models? And it can change radically. Or different laws forces you to change the whole database, like with GDPR. I do agree with the OP just this reasoning doesn’t resonate with my experience in reg
277.
by he0001 8y ago
I believe that says more of the US than of having rules like GDPR. While the EU can really mess things up, they do work on it. It seems like the US legislation really have an inability to form laws like the GDPR. I think the American people
278.
by he0001 8y ago
I bet we’ll see research articles about how people use companies public data to pinpoint individuals in different ways. I’d think we all are going to be surprised what you can find from that data.
279.
by he0001 8y ago
Well, I don’t think Github can rewrite the history of a customers’ repo just like that.
280.
by he0001 8y ago
But attribution is not permanent legal requirement it’s eventually going to expire. And copyright or IP is about the owner of the repository, but not the personal information in a repository. I find it hard that “copyright” or IP applies to
281.
by he0001 8y ago
The exceptions are if there is an different law that supersedes GDPR. However none of them are indefinitely so sooner or later GDPR will apply.
282.
by he0001 8y ago
How?
283.
by he0001 8y ago
But that still requires to rewrite history in the repos [0]. What if the commits are signed etc. [0] https://www.git-tower.com/learn/git/faq/change-author-name-e...
284.
by he0001 8y ago
What about github? What happens if someone that have been a contributor to several projects and then says to github that they have to remove the data that is in those repositories. However they just cannot go in and erase history in compani
285.
by he0001 8y ago
I’ve tried a few different languages in different companies and positions. I think I understand the gist of the original article. It’s like saying German is more effective to write with than English or that German is easier to express poetr
286.
by he0001 8y ago
As an example; If I have an account on a block chain I still will know what it is and anyone that have been interacting with that account could still identify the account. And GDPR says explicitly that it shouldn’t be possible at all to i
287.
by he0001 8y ago
With GDPR the scope of what is actual personal information is broadend. This means that an account number is considered personal information. How is any variant of an ID in a block chain different from an account id?
288.
by he0001 8y ago
But ofcourse it’s less ok to screw people the natural way than the money way...
289.
by he0001 8y ago
How are they superior?
290.
by he0001 8y ago
I have one question regarding who is going to destroy Bitcoin. When the GDPR is effective, financial transactions are, by at least European law, required to be saved some x years, like 10 years. But when that time have expired it falls unde
291.
by he0001 8y ago
So this is still a gray area, the law explicitly says that you should erase all data. So there can’t be any information that could that could be traced to you. Even if you do encrypt the data to let’s say “xuiidha” this is an identifier a
292.
by he0001 8y ago
How do you cryptographically shred it in a immutable blockhain? And what are the other options? It explicitly says you have to “erase the personal data”, GDPR Chapt 3 Art. 17
293.
by he0001 8y ago
How can it handle merge conflicts automatically?
294.
by he0001 8y ago
Immutable eh? What about GDPR?
295.
by he0001 9y ago
There’s no distinction between storage and backup. Most large backup companies are developing fixes for removing data in backups.
296.
by he0001 9y ago
In this case perhaps, but it usually becomes some sort of deep claim of how the universe work. And I do think asynchronous computer execution is not even close to how the world operates, so it’s not even a good metaphor.
297.
by he0001 9y ago
This article highlight a really interesting point here: Trust. And even if there are the “proof-of-work” people are going to distrust that “it’s a mathematical proof”. Just look at Trumps alt-facts and “fake news”. You don’t need to go even
298.
by he0001 9y ago
Uh, no. It was about if the world is asynchronous or not. I don’t have much to say about OP, but the “world is asynchronous” usually comes up in these discussions. I think that’s really wierd and wanted more info about it since I haven’t ye
299.
by he0001 9y ago
”The primary focus of this article is asynchronous control in digital electronic systems.[1][2] In a synchronous system, operations (instructions, calculations, logic, etc.) are coordinated by one, or more, centralized clock signals. An asy
300.
by he0001 9y ago
https://twitter.com/OrenDorell/status/979764266646622209 Russian news confirmed it and later us state department. Russian news https://amp.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=3001089&3001089&3001089=&

More ›