3 ms·
But attribution is not permanent legal requirement it’s eventually going to expire. And copyright or IP is about the owner of the repository, but not the person
by he0001 8y ago
But attribution is not permanent legal requirement it’s eventually going to expire. And copyright or IP is about the owner of the repository, but not the personal information in a repository. I find it hard that “copyright” or IP applies to personal information unless you are the one owning it, which you don’t if you work for a company. However it could be kind of funny if you work another company contributing to a project owned by another company.
About “defense of legal claims”, removing people from the history will only strengthen your claim as the owner of the repo?
I’m not convinced that paragraph 3 actually applies here, not sure what exact claims can be done for keeping that information as it is. And can github “hide” behind such vague exceptions?
- extra88 8y agoGitHub may have to add some capabilities but I'm thinking about the people running the repo; retaining attribution of submissions as a defense against accusations of code theft. I was also mainly thinking about public repos open source, not code contributions by employees in a work-for-hire situation.