hdkdicnsnjes

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hdkdicnsnjes 1y ago

   Real
2. 2.▲
   by hdkdicnsnjes 1y ago

   Isn’t this just dunning kruger? Try and build something substantial for your gene science thing rather than some notebook script or CRUD app and see what complexity you run into.
3. 3.▲
   by hdkdicnsnjes 1y ago

   Write a macro DSL in Clojure for it then throw it up as a library. To get to a higher level of abstraction than the general purpose languages you have to get more specific, maybe someone just hasn’t done it yet for your use case.
4. 4.▲
   by hdkdicnsnjes 1y ago

   Does SQL or regex as a language rot? I’d say the abstraction above using SQL or regex to implement it rots, because it’s not formalised as a language. Does the implementation leak through things like JSON or a EBNF grammar? Performance can
5. 5.▲
   by hdkdicnsnjes 1y ago

   Ah shit, right, it’s probably for the best lisp isn’t mainstream.
6. 6.▲
   by hdkdicnsnjes 1y ago

   Imagine the software industry if lisp was mainstream.
7. 7.▲
   by hdkdicnsnjes 1y ago

   The nuts and bolts will be embeddable DSL’s, they are the only code which does not rot. Put them in a hierarchy with one compiling down into another or several and you have your building.