Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hdhuegau6hfhd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
why do they insist on using average where median would be much more useful way to measure this ( lower extremes impact )?
2.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
The issue is no reliable data can easily be found ( closest for me was this - https://www.statista.com/statistics/183505/number-of-vehicle... ) suggesting that neither of us actually knows. Sounds to me like a bad
3.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
- My wife and I drive EVs that we get in, press a button, and it starts, similar to our previous ICE vehicles. Sure but 1. how much was you upfront cost for either 2. how big is ur family 3. daily commute distance 4. use case - Just look at
4.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
is it suvs commuting to work or all types, because you mught be cherry picking your stats if you present avg occupancy for all cars in us as an argument here
5.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
what about the bike owner? does their safety matter? it is really not all about you.
6.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
And presumably those same people will charge it.. where? where is infrastructure and please dont say presumably -Most poor don't buy new, and if they do, there are vehicles like the Bolt that are cheaper than your typical new SUV on av
7.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
Statistically unlikely given that SUV carries more people, which translates into higher moron encounter chance since more morons are now forced onto other mode of transport. You just increased your odds. As for seriously, have you ever seen
8.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
But won't those morons just be replaced by morons on bikes, scooters and bicycles? Is that actually better for end user?
9.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
Fill is an interesting verb. I suppose you could try to tetris it up each trip to the store, but unpacking would just as inconvenient as packing. That said, if you buy a weeksworth of food for 3 kids, sedan may easily overflow.
10.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
3y ago
Eh. And who will suffer? Poor people. Why? 'Drive a bus', that is why is the gist of reasoning here. Naturally, upper income and wealthy individuals will still drive crazy toys, but that is ok.
11.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
4y ago
I so wish that to be true, but if Ukraine proved anything, it is exactly that might is right is alive is well ( for example, Germany only buckled after nordstream blew up or India just saying no to US restrictions on gas purchases ).
12.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
4y ago
I can't speak for parent, but there is a point at which I just stop caring. Either thinga will get bad enough and people will revolt like they tend to do when its too late or they won't. Nihilism is one hell of a drug. Separately,
13.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
4y ago
True AND the results were major adjustments to the regulatory regime to banks. Without going into politics too much, banks successfully lobbied congress to relax those rules for banks of 50b size. In fact, SVB president argued for it in fro
14.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
4y ago
A bailout is a bailout is a bailout. I am not sure why people get so offended by this. Here it is a bailout with extra steps to allow for claims that it is not a bailout. I have no real horse here. My market exposure is maybe 10k usd now. T
15.
▲
by
hdhuegau6hfhd
4y ago
Bell curve a classic for a reason and even though I heard some complaints before, I don't recall complaints that disproved its core points. Would you care to elaborate on the famously racist parts ( and ideally what is racist about the