hayd

35 ms·

361.
by hayd 11y ago
Someone apparently did a run in 42seconds ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkQdwUns7H8 Edit: Ah, that's "tool assisted".
362.
by hayd 11y ago
I guess it's unclear what you meant by "mess". Some companies think training their devs is worthwhile, especially after losing days/work/$ through git messes. :)
363.
by hayd 11y ago
> but not with it transforming into TWO of something I suppose that's why Banach–Tarski is considered a paradox.
364.
by hayd 11y ago
I recommend regularly updating your branch of master via fast-forward. That way if you are working with a slightly different git history, git will complain loudly (refuse to update). This also has the benefit of complaining if someone else
365.
by hayd 11y ago
Whilst this is occasionally useful, it's best avoided in my opinion as it's incredibly difficult to review a merge commit (especially a large merge commit). (Most of the time I'd advocate, if you have to do larger proje
366.
by hayd 11y ago
I think the point was: if you have a PR with two commits, you can squash it to a single commit and force push. This will update the PR to just have the single commit. (Similarly with a rebase.)
367.
by hayd 11y ago
Then someone else rebases over that commit, there's a conflict and lo! the tests fail. Why? typo. It's fixed in the subsequent commit (which you can't see). Lovely. There's something to be said for having every commit pa
368.
by hayd 11y ago
What were the (broken) rules on transportation-related apps?? Best of luck not dropping the ball this time!
369.
by hayd 11y ago
"As the software is open source, however, hobbyists are also free to use it, but to post to this mailing list, they are expected to demonstrate at least a minimal level of 'cluefulness' by using an email address with their ow
370.
by hayd 11y ago
I've not seen this story on Reddit... Weird.
371.
by hayd 11y ago
"Dr. Campaigne has been informed that the reply has been written and is not interested in further coordination." This seems a bit harsh!
372.
by hayd 11y ago
> personality trait that is reasonably unusual in the general population I'm not sure this part is true. "submission to a fairly arbitrary set of rules" sounds like every job. > that's not normally what people thin
373.
by hayd 11y ago
I thought they were going to extend the analogy to contributing to open source software...
374.
by hayd 11y ago
Interesting command. IMO not force pushing to master is a good rule of thumb... Changing master's history should definitely not be part of your workflow. (and is going to cause problems.)
375.
by hayd 11y ago
I guess it comes down to what it means to "think logically"? If you can solve previously unseen algebra problems, and improve your understanding you're having to "think logically" - you're not just randomly but
376.
by hayd 11y ago
> Under such a proposal, no one person or agency would hold all of the pieces, an approach some experts speculate could make such a backdoor harder to compromise. And implement.
377.
by hayd 11y ago
Price: $Low. WTF? Edit: I see, on the other page it states http://hivewind.com/pricing-signup/ (~$70-260 a month).
378.
by hayd 11y ago
> His books are freely available under a Creative Commons license... So perhaps they will be available for free from April 25th?
379.
by hayd 12y ago
$190-250, sheesh - that fine amount is far to high. The maximum parking fine in LA, for parking on a red curb, only costs you $93.
380.
by hayd 12y ago
"given the game's age, I expected the 3D format to be quite simple and straight forward." lolz :)
381.
HBO renews Silicon Valley(hbowatch.com)
1 points by hayd 12y ago|0 comments
382.
by hayd 12y ago
There's no problem here, the issue is that the journal reviewers were complaining the code wasn't written in R, which seems strange when non-vectorizable algorithms essentially force code to be written in another language (the sam
383.
by hayd 12y ago
Also, many R packages end up being written in cpp.
384.
by hayd 12y ago
Would be interesting to see the 10/90% too.
385.
by hayd 12y ago
You have your own local branches...
386.
by hayd 12y ago
> Because they are so complicated, they are unlikely to have evolved twice. I don't get this argument at all. It seems obvious that most of the time an organism gains a property it immediately dies (or fails to pass it to its offspr
387.
by hayd 12y ago
How's it different from mailing lists? IMO after a certain stage the gamification aspect goes away (for high rep users) - that's not the reason they contribute.
388.
by hayd 12y ago
Also, RMS wishes he'd seen it at the time... http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg005... (bizarre)
389.
LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal (2005)(gcc.gnu.org)
18 points by hayd 12y ago|2 comments
390.
by hayd 12y ago
and they say all this without mentioning io.js...

More ›