hatefulheart

5 ms·

61.
by hatefulheart 7mo ago
There are so many comments along the lines of: "What's the matter, just fork it when it goes bad?" The problem is that uv in and of itself, whilst a great technical achievement isn't sufficient. Astral run a massive DevO
62.
by hatefulheart 9mo ago
False equivalency. The maintenance and expertise required to run the codebase you’ve generated still falls flatly on you. When you use a library or a framework it normally is domain experts that do that stuff.
63.
by hatefulheart 9mo ago
“Whatever he did or didn’t invent, he made a ton of invention possible.“ I think it’s time to pony up. Where are your vibe coded databases that take on SQLite and Postgres? Where are your vibe coded Operating Systems? Where are your vibe co
64.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
Pro as in pros and cons, not as in professional.
65.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
I’m a small business owner and solo developer on that business. Let’s just say I’d rather know the costs of my choices upfront. I’m sure there is not one small business owner in tech who would turn their nose up at that.
66.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
Sure, where one is ignorant of the other. That’s not a pro.
67.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
With all due respect you are living in a different world. Not in a bad way, it’s just you haven’t experienced what maintenance on a large complicated code base is like.
68.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
What do you recommend?
69.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
Do you think everyone you speak to online is this misinformed or has these takes? I’ve read and listened to enough of Linus to know he says this himself. The Linux kernel is nothing without the maintainers, this is easily observable and eve
70.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
Your trainers clearly never read Starting Strength.
71.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
I wouldn’t be saying that it takes more than Linus to build Linux if Linus agreed with me? What on earth are you talking about? Don’t quit your day job to become a detective.
72.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
I think there is a difference between automating “things” (as you put it) and getting to the point where people are on stage suggesting that the government becomes a “backstop” to their investments in automation.
73.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
Sorry to burst your bubble but it takes more than Linus to make Linux.
74.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
I think I understand now, the Cookie just is not present in the POST if a user clicked on, for example, a maliciously crafted post from a different origin?
75.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
What does this even mean? I’m not being rude, what does it mean to unexpectedly carry cookies? That’s not what I understand the risk of CSRF is. My understanding is that we want to ensure a POST came from our website and we do so with a dou
76.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
Good question, it’s not. You're responding to just another Rust and/or LLM fanatic claiming they can predict the future. Dime a dozen on this board.
77.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
I’m confused, how does this prevent a CSRF attack? SameSite or not is inconsequential to the check a backend does for a CSRF token in the POST.
78.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
Simon have you got to the point where you just don’t read the article? Others have pointed out your interpretation of long task is not the same as the article. Maybe this is the negative effects of excessive LLM usage that are spoken about.
79.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
What purpose does this statement serve? Everyone working in programming is writing code for a project more like Postgres or Linux than they are a project like making a wood cabinet or a life drawing.
80.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
Your tone is kind of ridiculous. It’s insane this has to be pointed out to you but here we go. Hammers are the best, they can drive nails, break down walls and serve as a weapon. From now on the military will, plumber to paratrooper, use no
81.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
I’m afraid the boosters hear nothing. The commenter you’re replying to, in their heart of hearts, truly believes in 5 years that an LLM will be writing the majority of the code for a project like say Postgres or Linux. Worth bearing in mind
82.
by hatefulheart 10mo ago
Unrelated to the article but I want to address something that really rubs me up the wrong way about comments on HN. I recall the ML phase we had before the “AI” phase and I do not remember anyone disputing that complex mathematical models c
83.
by hatefulheart 11mo ago
You’re absolutely right!
84.
by hatefulheart 11mo ago
Sorry but your SQL comparison is way off. SQL is deterministic, has a defined implementation that databases must follow and when you run a statement it presents a query plan. This is the absolute opposite to using an LLM. Please stop using
85.
by hatefulheart 11mo ago
If you read the first 5 sentences of the article you’d see there are at least 3 popular front end libraries that do morphing. I think suggesting the world has settled on anything when it comes to technology is very silly. *Edit fixed typo.
86.
by hatefulheart 11mo ago
Oh do get a hobby Dylan.
87.
by hatefulheart 11mo ago
Hey Dylan, you’re being an ass. Their tone was disgraceful, let me explain by giving you an example of how posts should be made. “Hey! This looks interesting, quick search on Google didn’t explain what the BEAM is as well as I would like, c
88.
by hatefulheart 11mo ago
Agreed. The tone in which people like the parent comment is disgraceful. I’m sorry this is hacker news and hackers know that BEAM is the Erlang VM, no introduction or explanation needed. It is respected and admired as a great piece of engin
89.
by hatefulheart 1y ago
Hey Delaney! Thanks for you and your teams work. It doesn't put me off the project! I will happily pay for great software that enables me to make money just like I'd pay for good tools around the house (once I get started with D*)
90.
by hatefulheart 1y ago
As much as I like Delaney, the discord server and Datastar I find this question baffling. If the Postgres team released PGPro, swore it just contained anti patterns and you can just write the code yourself if you needed that feature, you’d

More ›