hatefulheart

5 ms·

31.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
What are those complications? Last I heard Claude Code devs were trying to compare their app to a game engine or rendering system. This was summarily ridiculed. Are you saying that writing a game engine is easier than writing Claude Code?
32.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
You’re on a forum where people share anecdotes, so presumably, you? Are you dumb or are you just pretending? I’m going to guess the former!
33.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
So there is no CPU cycles for the ORM itself? That’s free?
34.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
Oh it was just a flex? Ok then!
35.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
Looks like I’m not the only one, check the thread.
36.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
You got it in one, small world huh?
37.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
I think your tone is a bit combative. You can certainly provide the cliff notes but if you want me to believe you’re at working at computational limits whilst talking to me about string concatenation in web dev backend languages I think the
38.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
I’m not sure why you thought I meant code clarity and not performance? It’s clear in all cases the correct SQL query will be more performant. Confused at what you’re evening trying to say here. Are you suggesting that 100 lines of applicati
39.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
What optimizations are you making here when at the end of the day performance is dictated by the schema, the query planner and the network?
40.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
I have seen many ORM enjoyers argue the point about “you can just use SQL!” but I have never once seen an ORM enjoyer allow it, much less do it themselves in an actual codebase. They will time and time again prefer you write 100 lines of Ty
41.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
This is also why the conclusion of the article is extremely bizarre. I’m not keeping my eyes peeled for more articles from this individual.
42.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
This is a very cringe take. Me and OP aren’t super heroes, we can’t do what a team of talented individuals created even if that team existed many moons ago. That isn’t the point. We both questioned the tone and the conclusion of the comment
43.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
Exactly. Please get used to this sort of depressive, absurd and out of touch tone from HNers, it’s literally all they do now. Don’t bother calling people here hackers anymore, they have checked out emotionally and spiritually.
44.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
You can add a dev dependency in your pyprojec.toml with uv, look it up.
45.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
Are you suggesting we can make this comparison because there are no meaningful differences in society from the early 20th century to today? I reject this argument as bad faith from the start.
46.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
Indeed it is so self evidently useful that you have to discover the correct way to use it.
47.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
This is clearly a ploy to normalise slop PRs, slop in the FOSS world more generally and the timing is telling. We are in the midst of large open source projects rejecting LLM contributions, this is a response.
48.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
Ok but is it not fair to say that without the first thing all of those things are irrelevant? Again, why are we even having this discussion? Ask Elizabeth Holmes how not having a product (whilst doing everything else you mentioned) goes.
49.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
Yes we have heard this before, React is only 30kb! But that misses the enormous amount of infra you need to even just do a basic fetch. (Read the post by the React Query author on whether you need React Query or not) Likewise with JWTs for
50.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
With all due respect this reads a little deranged. To sell something to the masses you fundamentally need a product to sell. I'll agree that how you market the product can be a "product" in itself, but that only gets you so f
51.
by hatefulheart 4mo ago
What does telling your customers you plan to make a game unplayable if it doesn’t perform exactly as you expect financially have to do with technical reality, pray tell?
52.
by hatefulheart 5mo ago
Oh my god! This model is incredible! A massive leap for humanity!
53.
by hatefulheart 5mo ago
Maybe in your fantasy world. In reality people are rarely rich based on merit alone. EDIT: Sorry it was a really clever joke.
54.
by hatefulheart 5mo ago
I interact with Assembly everyday and many of those around me do too. So I wouldn’t label it as niche. If there are thousands of people doing something in computing, it ain’t niche. It’s niche when the numbers are much smaller than that. Ju
55.
by hatefulheart 5mo ago
You’re absolutely right! If a project has less than 1 million active developers it must be old and shite!
56.
by hatefulheart 5mo ago
Ah yes, the niche that is video, audio, game and systems programming. When those three to four amateurs still doing those niche things grow up they’ll move on to real programming, like putting together a solid skills.md file.
57.
by hatefulheart 5mo ago
What on earth are you talking about? Assembly makes sense in desktop computing as well. Have you ever, for example, watched a video? What do you think powers the codecs, JSX?
58.
by hatefulheart 6mo ago
I don't believe this. Either you're lying, or you just haven't caught on how to use a computer. Everything I do to interact with my computer is still the same. See how boring you are?
59.
by hatefulheart 7mo ago
I read comments like these in bewilderment. Have you worked for a company that hasn’t created its own, as you put it “mini language”? Have you worked for a company that doesn’t indulge in over engineering, over abstraction and hidden cost?
60.
by hatefulheart 7mo ago
So when Charlie Marsh goes on a podcast saying that the majority the complications they face with their work is in DevOps, he's also overstating things? But you know best it seems!

More ›