Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
haswell
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> thoughtfully polished > enhancing it with care I get what you’re going for with this comment, but it seamlessly anthropomorphizes what’s happening in a way that has the opposite impact I think. There is no thoughtfulness or care
62.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
Chicago has over 100 free tennis courts across the city. https://www.chicagoparkdistrict.com/facilities/tennis-courts
63.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
Most customers did. But due to a wide variety of customer types and various hybrid auth environments, we had to support 2FA directly in-platform as well. There were also privilege elevation scenarios to consider, e.g. to access highly sensi
64.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
I completely disagree. Constructive criticism and healthy debate is entirely possible without violating the guidelines, and happens quite a bit. If people can’t figure out how to have conversations that aren’t “boring, pointless, fawning” w
65.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
I realize in retrospect my comment was probably confusing as written. The company didn’t charge extra for SSO despite the support cost, also for ideological reasons. But they were also singularly focused on large enterprise customers so it
66.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
To add an anecdote from the other perspective, I was the PM for the authn/z capabilities of a big enterprise platform. SSO was one of the greatest support burdens due to the numerous protocols we supported and the vast array of sometim
67.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
I’m also a happy customer. Regarding payments, I pay yearly. At the time I signed up I think it was the only option. They do have a $1.99/month option now, but they still offer yearly pricing.
68.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
I think curiosity is a form of questioning. Regarding your distinction, I'm still confused. In a very literal sense, what is the difference between "questions" and "questioning" in your mind? i.e. what are some exam
69.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> Questions can be neutral but questioning is probably negative The ethos of HN is to err on the side of assuming good faith and the strongest possible interpretation of other's positions, and to bring curiosity first and foremost
70.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
I know I said I was done, but I wanted to say that this comment is the most coherent representation of your position so far, and I appreciate that. To be clear, I'm very against any kind of implied "ownership" and believe emp
71.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> there’s nothing wrong with hiring other companies’ employees, commonly referred to as “poaching.” I find it interesting that you used the language "other companies' employees". Isn't this even more problematic tha
72.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> “Poach” for employees didn’t arise independently This is missing the point. No business person is using the word “poach” in the context of hiring is conflating it with hunting animals. People describing the act of poaching employees
73.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
Your dictionary is either not exhaustive, or it’s out of date. The word is not limited to the notions of “stealing” or “appropriation”, nor has it been for decades. Just one example, but current dictionaries cover the business use of the wo
74.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> But “poach” as in employees is clearly derived from “poach” as in game. This is not obvious to me at all, nor have I ever conflated the two in my mind. Hell, the literal dictionary disagrees with you. But beyond this, language evolve
75.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> because it implies that employees are property than can be stolen What makes you believe this? The definition of “poach” is not intrinsically linked to the notion of ownership/property. The word has several definitions, one of w
76.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
I think it’s a bit disingenuous to frame this as a situation no different than “paying market rate”. Whether you like this or not, the practice of hiring employees specifically to work on the same thing elsewhere or to drain a company of it
77.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> They made a better offer — in other words competed — in the labor market. And when this is done for the sole purpose of acquiring a specific kind of talent - especially to build exactly the same thing - it’s called poaching. The word
78.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
Before smartphones, there was not an equivalent number of people burying their heads in newspapers. Many people point to “well this is just the new X”, but I think this underrepresents the impact of modern tech, which in many cases bears a
79.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
Genuinely very curious: are you finding that meaningful numbers of experienced developers are turning to these visual workflow tools instead of writing code for substantial use cases? I was a bit confused by the post because it seems to be
80.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
In a past life, I ran a tools/operations team at a big company for years and later was the product manager for a visual workflow/integration product for a number of years. I've been the IT department trying to manage the craz
81.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
Very much depends on the airport. Before I was an experienced traveler, I used to show up at O’Hare in Chicago 3 hours early because who knows how long the security lines will be. It was overkill, but gave me piece of mind. At some point I
82.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
My point more broadly is that it doesn’t make sense to frame this as merely a matter of efficiency, nor was my claim that one can just ignore efficiency. Humans need a variety of things to live happy lives. Strong social connection is as i
83.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> Yes, it's lonely, but it's more efficient. It doesn’t make much sense to me to put loneliness against efficiency. What does it matter if it’s “inefficient” to maintain friendships of the easily is a lonely life without soci
84.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
Despite often being against the rules this is absolutely a thing all over Chicago during the warmer months. Boozy picnics at the beaches, wine in plastic cups at the parks, etc. And fully sanctioned alcohol at the dozens of neighborhood str
85.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> I truly believe that if any company can be morally good, Gilead qualifies. The primary reason Gilead exists in my memory is the headline years back about their exorbitantly high prices for a life saving hepatitis C drug and the resul
86.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
The issue I have with comments like this one is the one-dimensional notion of value described as "productivity gains" for a single person. There are many things in this world that could be fairly described as "more productive
87.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
How are you defining fine grained permissions? All I care about is having separate accounts for each person who will log in, even if I’m the only person. I again can’t agree with your conclusion that this is more pain than it’s worth. But i
88.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
I self host about 20 separate apps. I’m in the middle of an SSO implementation project because I do not want to continue managing credentials for 20 separate apps. I’ve considered opening some of these apps to family members, and having one
89.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> The rejection of any "higher power" is precisely what being an atheist is for a lot of us. Accepting that we are just the result of random thermodynamic processes in a cold and uncaring universe I’m somewhere between atheis
90.
▲
by
haswell
1y ago
> Attributing a suicide to anyone other than the actor starts to appear oxymoronic very quickly. No one is an island. We’re all deeply intertwined/interconnected. We’re the sum total of our lived experiences and without a doubt so
More ›