haskellshill

10 ms·

61.
by haskellshill 1y ago
> my side is good and your side is evil, just because it is, okay?
62.
by haskellshill 1y ago
> no one but the people who know you care in the slightest > someone puts up a service that let people upload a picture of your face and have it return a dossier with every bit of video you've ever appeared in Okay and why exactl
63.
by haskellshill 1y ago
I think you imagine governments as being a lot more capable and interested in you than they really are. You haven't even told me what you think they'll actually do with that dreaded database, except keep it.
64.
by haskellshill 1y ago
> used for things I can't even imagine today So why worry about it? It's like worrying a camera will "capture your soul" or whatever the story about those tribesmen is. > a local environment a specific behavior mig
65.
by haskellshill 1y ago
So your specific real world example is that nothing happened, but IF somebody had filmed them then you IMAGINE they would have "gotten a visit". Very specific and real world.
66.
by haskellshill 1y ago
You're afraid of threats and violence because they judge you for poor grammar? Okay...
67.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Cooking your own food is great if you value your time at $0. I just eat fast food every day to maximize my free time (spent on doomscrolling).
68.
by haskellshill 1y ago
And that's bad because?
69.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Questions such as?
70.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Okay, and? There's a difference between one person seeing me in public and two, but no meaningful difference
71.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Funny that you imagine AI-coders doing any sort of thinking
72.
by haskellshill 1y ago
But what practical difference does it have that it's "available via digital media to the world."? Are you just opposed to people not in your physical location seeing you? Why?
73.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Sorry, but why even care about this? Is it an invasion of your privacy if strangers see you walking down the street? If no, how is strangers seeing you walking down the street in the background of some youtube video a privacy violation??
74.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Great idea, and soon there will be a "I accept to be recorded in public" button you need to press before you're let out of your house.
75.
by haskellshill 1y ago
> It has a wide base, so the laptop just swings back and forth while carrying. > Can slide out easily and fall when toppled. What..? Do you live in some ideal zero-friction world or what?
76.
by haskellshill 1y ago
No, sorry, poking fun at the uselessness of JS frameworks still does not make JS a good language
77.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Pfft, look up my gym routine, bet I bench more than you
78.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Hah, sitting in a car is still not impressive
79.
by haskellshill 1y ago
That's a very stupid gotcha because the newly released code is just as insecure, only it's been audited for shorter
80.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Is it really that confusing though? He's just using a python script that runs the program instead of linking it. Sure the details may be interesting but the high-level concept is obvious
81.
by haskellshill 1y ago
As well as "don't use anything JS related"
82.
by haskellshill 1y ago
I mean he's been running version 20 for years already, what's changed to make it now suddenly insecure?
83.
by haskellshill 1y ago
I will never understand F1 fans. So many engineering hours and so much gas wasted just to drive in a circle a bit faster than the other guy. It's not even remotely applicable to any real task due to the myriad of arbitrary rules. At le
84.
by haskellshill 1y ago
That's three sentences, none of which are particularly difficult to parse
85.
by haskellshill 1y ago
That's silly. If they show their work I won't have to trust them. Compare answering "The answer is 5, just compute it yourself." on a math test, vs. actually showing the calculation. The former clearly implies the person
86.
by haskellshill 1y ago
> If LibreOffice started from scratch What do you mean though? Libreoffice wrote their application from scratch, did they not? And they managed to implement a superior serialization format, did they not? And they managed to get that form
87.
by haskellshill 1y ago
> who is ever going to sign up for another contract with [VMware]? Oh geez I dunno, surely now it's over for them
88.
by haskellshill 1y ago
> Remember how people writing assembly thought compiled languages would rot your brain! Well, how'd you describe web apps of today if not precisely brainrot? > They don't care about actual productivity, they care about feeli
89.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Wasn't BitchAt launched like a couple of weeks ago? Did it die already?
90.
by haskellshill 1y ago
Uh okay? A drink company thinks their customers look like normal people? So what?

More ›