Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
harry8
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
601.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Mainstream media has "owners" who "fire" editors when they don't like the stories being written. Journalist pitch stories at those editors. See Rupert Murdoch and the Times of London, The News of the World, The Sun,
602.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
>eager to say that the US Congress and the CIA can't be trusted. This is a truth universally accepted, no? I mean maybe not by some actual, genuine believers in totalitarianism but surely there aren't many of those? Surely? You
603.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Kind of underscores Taibbi's credibility that he'll pick a fight with Musk and be shadowbanned though, huh?
604.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
> if you look at the investors[0] in Substack FFS this is like claiming you are funded by BoA or JPM if your salary is deposited there. They are literally paid by their subscribers, Substack is a mere payment & publication tool. Subs
605.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Yep, I got that totally wrong. I wonder how I managed that. Had near total expectation that I was going to find that the other way around when I went back to check. Dose of humility for the day.
606.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Bug! Depth of the balls doesn't change when they're thrown forward and across or back and across between the 2 jugglers.
607.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
> The core of functional programming is about avoiding mutable states, I can't keep up, does this mean scheme is not a functional language anymore by modern definition?
608.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Oh come on now that's not fair. No matter how utterly woeful and corrupt tech journalism had been (and horrific is the adjective I'd use) drawing parallels to Jim Kramer is just unseemly.
609.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
SBC - Single Board Computer. Raspberry Pi most famous example? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-board_computer In this instance consider the SBC a lightweight, low-power, always on server sitting behind his/he
610.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
The photographers who took those stock photos also trained on stock photos.
611.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
esp8266 and esp32 boards from ali plus various parts. Flashed with tasmota or (for the glow electricity meter reader esphome). Temp & humidity sensors, somfy blind controllers, ws2812 strips, relay to infra-red to control hifi receivers
612.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
I'm sorry, I thought it was public. Can't work out how to change it. Nuts. #if 0 //instructions to build and run THIS_FILE=$0 BIN_FILE=/tmp/$(basename $0) gcc -std=c11 -O0 -g -march=native $THIS_FILE
613.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Captchas on that will be interesting. "Prove you are not human." "What is 0.3 - 0.1? heh heh heh...."
614.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Doing it locally is better, for mine. eg https://gitlab.com/hal88/junkcode/-/blob/master/c_template.c single file, chmod +x, compiles itself and executes the binary, can easily give the -S flag
615.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Using an operating system you have to tinker with to get working right, and even fix when it breaks means you learn a lot about the low level of what an operating system is, and how this one does it. That information translates to being use
616.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
That's a new one, you have no right to privacy for your banking records. Obviously you don't actually believe that when seeing it written out. This is a change in what conduct is considered legal. Didn't used to be, now found
617.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
running a mainstream distro & desktop env on a thinkpad t480s is significantly easier, more efficient and less fragile than any windows laptop I've ever used, seen or heard of. Less signficantly so but still easier than any apple l
618.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Nah it is. When something "just works" you don't learn much about how. When your graphics card driver shits itself, you learn something getting it working again. Console text editor at the minimum! It's not "misery
619.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Too easy nowadays. Pick an esoteric BSD?
620.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Yeah it's really annoying for the government officials to have to prove you're a criminal before treating you like one. Imagine founding a nation where these employees had to actually do that? When collection agencies perform secr
621.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Locking your house, bars on jails, wearing a vest all take none of our rights away. Doesn't compare with giving away rights to government agencies for their convenience in countering things you haven't done and may not. If you can
622.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
>This wasn't in pursuit of a future crime The future crime is him possibly moving or hiding assets, which is the justification for the secrecy. If that asset movement were not possible there's no need of secrecy. If the asset m
623.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
> "...interested persons might move or hide collectable assets, making the agency’s collection efforts substantially harder." Is that asset movement or hiding illegal? Hasn't happened yet either way. A: Yes it is illegal.
624.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Let's flip it then. Why does the IRS need any secrecy at all here? Or better Why does /any/ government agency require /any/ secret search powers without a properly executed warrant where they justify that?
625.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
So when someone at the IRS with no oversight does something utterly evil and totally illegal for whatever reason they had and your business gets ruined as a result, you are bankrupted and you could have easily prevented it all because any j
626.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Oh for goodness sakes what is going on here? So much ridiculous, wordy justification of the unjustifiable! Is it just AKTCHUALLY dialled up to eleven or something else? There is NO WARRANT here. None. If there were a warrant then a judge co
627.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
The whole thing can happen in secret. No gag does not require your notification. That secrecy will be abused. Count on it.
628.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Nonsense, the reasoning is completely sound and you have misread. The justification for secret powers executed in secret is that the "party in question" might proceed to do something else wrong in the future if they were notif
629.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
The above analysis bothers the hell out of me. Because you might do something /wrong/ we need to have secret powers executed in secret. Surely if moving assets is wrong, there's a law that says in these circumstances you may
630.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
There are as many different ways of disagreeing as there are pairs of people. I don't know what this kind of naked abuse with no substance achieves but whatever it is, there are /plenty/ of places to do it. It's been a t
More ›