harry8

3 ms·

1.
by harry8 6d ago
You look for the actual evidence and work out how much of what you've heard is BS.
2.
by harry8 6d ago
Everyone should be incandescent with rage about that as soon as there's some evidence of it. And 100% it should be fully investigated. Is it real? Are you being played with a lie? The further out we get the more it looks like the latte
3.
by harry8 6d ago
By the standards of "jaw dropping things we heard" for which we now know there is no evidence. Not even any leaks of suggestive circumstantial evidence. Nothing to back the awful fantasies of things done to children. Zero. Most, i
4.
by harry8 6d ago
The point for those who clearly missed it is an objection to “if you know nothing more” No. Find out more. You could still be wrong but it’s less likely than if you apply hokey heuristics on wilful ignorance hoping it somehow works out sigh
5.
by harry8 7d ago
If you’re C suite, ignorant and stupid and don’t know what you’re doing which choice minimises your chance of screwing up? The above is an analogy for that situation. If you’re not stupid it fails because you can find out and then make an
6.
by harry8 10d ago
Always have a folder in your hand when visiting other teams in other parts of the office. Print out some code, a few pages of spec, whatever. Just don't go walkabout empty-handed.
7.
by harry8 15d ago
Why can’t Google do this? Surely their data is better than yours. They get paid for adverts to bots don’t they? Unrelated?
8.
by harry8 15d ago
What is the state of setting up a rival ai service, using frontier open weight models retrained for new info or ideological reasons using something like unsloth?
9.
by harry8 1mo ago
The latency is not an illusion and yes Apple absolutely did that. It isn't plausible that they don't know they are doing it. It is ridiculous to suggest otherwise. Go pick up an iphone 6 and try to do anything with it and then tel
10.
by harry8 1mo ago
Latency mostly. Maybe it’s an illusion flowing from the latency stutters but it really doesn’t feel as precise as when it was new.
11.
by harry8 1mo ago
On an x86 laptop you run linux. Too easy. xfce if it's 4G ram. Can you do that with an M{1..4} ? You sure can't do it with an iphone. I own one an iphone 15. Was beautiful when new. Even now it has started on the path of suck. App
12.
by harry8 1mo ago
> Not updating to Tahoe helps with that too. Apple - the absolute kings of planned obsolescence. Who else could do it so brazenly AND have a bunch of zealots who will now reply to this defending them and attcking anyone who points it out
13.
by harry8 1mo ago
That feels like every review of LG should mention their quality is garbage to me, impacting their sales dramatically. Why hasn't that happened?
14.
by harry8 1mo ago
>...the smaht guys think they know better, to a pathological extent where they tell other people what they ought to do with their things . Not just tell, actually nag, coerce and force, often in the teeth of their own total idiocy. &quot
15.
by harry8 2mo ago
Yes. That is the point. Borrow & buy is on the balance sheet as an asset and liability, as I explicitly said. If you buy a futures contract with 1m of underlying value - it is NOT on the balance sheet. The balance sheet is unchanged. Ec
16.
by harry8 2mo ago
The part where the rows switch order based on the last one you clicked so if you're searching you can't be systematic without an amazing memory is POISON for discoverability. Start on the top left tab, now it's on the bottom
17.
by harry8 2mo ago
Do you love it when people use religion to create rules like this as though people can be fooled into thinking they /know/ the mind of god?
18.
by harry8 2mo ago
Sooooooooo not true! https://i.chzbgr.com/full/9097033984/hE7CFF8DD/person-aa
19.
by harry8 2mo ago
Can be. They vary like _every_ other profession.
20.
by harry8 2mo ago
Funny how nostalgia differs for different people. I hated all that so much at the time that I installed linux (RH 7.x) from a magazine cd and learned to program in C & perl. That multirows tab UI thing was an utter abomination against u
21.
by harry8 2mo ago
This isn’t something in which I’m an expert on any of the current details. You can borrow a million dollars and use it to buy gold. An asset and a liability on the balance sheet each ba million dollars. You can buy futures contracts with an
22.
by harry8 2mo ago
There's regulation update and work around. The point of channeling the 1980s is because it was simple for the 101 explanation. Investment bakers will structure it for you if you need it, inline with the current regulatory environment.
23.
by harry8 2mo ago
if you can't meet your obligations as and when they fall due, you're insolvent. Contractual specification from there.
24.
by harry8 2mo ago
>Well technically they don’t own the debt Channelling the 1980s for off-balance sheet financing 101. From an economic perspective there is zero difference between borrowing to buy an asset and entering into a non-cancellable long term (e
25.
by harry8 3mo ago
Investors get spooked the only thing they can do is mark it to zero. There's no "getting your money back" It has been spent on salaries, servers, Washington PR firms, political donations...
26.
by harry8 3mo ago
Legal fees are insignificant to open ai. Either they get profitable and the money does not run out or they don't, eventually can't raise more and close leaving these proceedings irrelevant. At no point is money as a resource being
27.
Ask HN: Is anyone running local LLMs in their organization?
7 points by harry8 3mo ago|1 comments
28.
by harry8 3mo ago
Oh go on. Look down that list of winners and the list of top finishers for two decades prior to Armstrong and the amount of doping among them that we actually found about and seriously try to make the case that Armstrong is the reason for &
29.
by harry8 3mo ago
Oh do come on. Bernard Thévenet won in 1975 and has said he was using steroids. Armstrong was 4 years old at the time. We don't know about all the drug cheating at the TdF, just what we do know is damning in ways we can't pin on t
30.
by harry8 3mo ago
If Armstrong still absolutely makes you want to vomit, that's fine. https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/3840x2160/2503086-Lan...

More ›