Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
harry8
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
331.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Still for sale? https://uk-metering.net/products/netthings-energy-manager
332.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Used to use this with Lenovo watch X. Worked ok, private, inexpensive. Avoid the Lenovo app. What else works well with gadgetbridge? Any ios equivalent?
333.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
What’s the current status if the “conspiracy theory” that Google is largely run by cia “alumn” influencing in favor of current factions in charge of the cia? Crazy talk?
334.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Seems like an alternative definition of the word “publish” given it’s freely available for anyone to read…
335.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
>What if you had to show Government ID whenever you entered a grocery store, a library, a movie theater? What if you were tracked each time you consumed a video, a still image, an audio clip, or even a text message? 1) entered a groc
336.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Sven doesn’t care about contributing his changes back to your tree and does not assign you copyright. GPL is fine for Sven. Ingrid can use Sven’s GPL changes because she’ll use that license too. You want to dual licence, you can’t use Sven
337.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
If you keep things secret they can't be used in a regulation breach by people who don't know those things. We have /that/. Theft is illegal and you lock your house, and that regulation is a serious one. The idea we have
338.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
> genetic counsellors were surprised to find that I had no credible genetic risk factors So let's assume you committed to publishing your genome in advance regardless of result. Sounds like you spun the barrel and dry snapped to dem
339.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
>legally forbidden to use such data. Great training set to check the results of other factors, then use those to infer. Moreover "legally forbidden" means jack faeces unless you can point to people who had convictions recorded
340.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
https://nitter.net/halvarflake/status/1156815950873804800 for those who don't have an X a/c
341.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Walter Kirn & Matt Taibbi discuss it about 2 weeks back. https://open.spotify.com/episode/0aZnMGYuAM4mFnkJju36Y2
342.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Yep, yet another thing captured. Now if you want take a taxi you have the choice of iphone, android and nothing else. Add that to the lengthy list of modern life you're excluded from (including the govt!) if you exercise your supposed
343.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Justifying insurance with a possible future event that may not happen is another. Sure but it's very much a minority point of view.
344.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Sure it's well understood that it's a service fail and poor quality service leads to piracy.
345.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Bubble sort is just fantastic to wind up arrogant algo-nerd snobs because you can bust it out for anything that is likely to be already sorted or nearly so and it dominates. Algo-nerd snobs rarely seem to take into account that knowledge an
346.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Whether you are surprised or not is barely relevant. It is newsworthy and worth discussing particularly when there is concrete evidence on which to make or fail to make a case. "This surprises you?!" Is a statement that contribute
347.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Women are faced with being rated as sex objects usually out of 10. It is in the language "she's a 10" there are films [1]. Likely this is the point. [1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078721/?ref_=ttf
348.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Really good example. It also sucks that you have no way of knowing at build time whether autovectorisation succeeded. Even if you have it working initially it can silently break and you don't know where. So using clang, you're car
349.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
You can already program. When you program a hobby/research project in the language you want to learn (better) you program /with/ the grain of the language. It's a nice experience. Move over to implementing someone else&#
350.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
>You have already gotten the basics of faking data incorrect. Let's get past the unnecessary antagonism. Can you please explain the above? Or actually, forget it. You history suggests you don't respond and something like 99
351.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
There's a discussion to be had there but I say, now explicitly, that it is pointless in this kind of bad faith context. Frame your incredulity as a question. How can this be prevented without a nanny state? Libertarians in general, do
352.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
I've never met a libertarian who believed in the right to secretly adulterate product with undetectable slow acting poison customers don't know about or understand. It's on the level of "you made a choice, alone, purely
353.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
1. have no relationship with cloudflare. 2. turn on "do not track" 3. reach enlightenment.
354.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
wireguard is equally simple. Both pihole and wireguard are set and forget in my experience.
355.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/unbound/ You "trust" cloudflare ?
356.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
Wha? That is exactly the solution! Google is not in the first 100 of notable alternatives, is it? Really? It's so incredibly easy and vastly better. https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/unbound/
357.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
why anyone would use cloudflare for anything unless there were no other viable choice is beyond me. Honnestly, why? DNS has many, vastly better alternatives. edit: explanation I thought was common knowledge. Set "do not track" on
358.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
nobody talks, everybody walks.
359.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
>There isnt much value in incarcerating additional people simply for the sake of punishment/revenge. The idea is that everyone knowingly involved goes to jail. This way others presented with opportunity to go along with such fraud &
360.
▲
by
harry8
3y ago
>But I don't think there's any issue with plainly stating that you think the asker is wrong I completely agree with that.
More ›