harlequinn77

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by harlequinn77 4y ago

   It looks like a pretty clear cut case of embezzlement and fraud. They're both crimes.
2. 2.▲
   by harlequinn77 4y ago

   Thats the same S&P that are also famous for their role in the 2007/8 sub-prime mortgage and global financial crisis right?
3. 3.▲
   by harlequinn77 4y ago

   Also Australian, The only sensible reason I can think that BOM is not under https is that there are ancient mission critical consuming services somewhere that can't handle the upgrade. For example: a network of regional flood warning a
4. 4.▲
   by harlequinn77 4y ago

   But thats the point right? Why pay £100k for something that doesn’t matter?
5. 5.▲
   by harlequinn77 4y ago

   About 3.5 billion people watch the world cup. Thats worth a lot in advertising dollars.
6. 6.▲
   by harlequinn77 4y ago

   You're right that this is all mostly assumption. I've not seen anything about what they working, or even a break down by department, job role etc. The only thing was something like "10 managers for every developer", and
7. 7.▲
   by harlequinn77 4y ago

   Audi has just decided to enter F1 though, which may have a similar outcome...
8. 8.▲
   by harlequinn77 4y ago

   To be frank, twitter hasn't changed in 10 years. So in this hypothetical, the people building the future of the company have achieved nothing during this time and should absolutely be removed or replaced.
9. 9.▲
   by harlequinn77 4y ago

   And the censors don't like being censored. Everyone is a hypocrite