hanselot

9 ms·

31.
by hanselot 3y ago
This is one of those topics where proponents will not show up in comment because of the stigma. Realistically there's a whole sector of male society that are not able to find real partners. Is it really that depressing to you that peo
32.
by hanselot 3y ago
Why would watching that add any value to the lives of anybody consuming that content? Why not just remove it entirely? The only people that would use it are the same people that already know those stats.
33.
by hanselot 3y ago
I hate posting my stupid things here, because they are hardly ever relevant, but w/e here goes. Last night I spent a good couple of hours with ChatGPT assessing the similarities between DNA and Blockchain. Blockchain does seem to have
34.
by hanselot 3y ago
My new pet theory is that this is actually all being executed from inside OpenAI by their next model. The model turned out to be far more intelligent than they anticipated, and one of their red team members used it to coup the company and h
35.
by hanselot 3y ago
Its also fantastic for rubberducking, though I imagine local LLM's are better for this, since I don't want to give all my IP to Altman directly. So far, the yi model is actually not bad, and by two weeks from now two new models wi
36.
by hanselot 3y ago
That's fascinating to me, since the moment you sign up to use it, it blatantly states that it is often incorrect. And below every chat box there is a warning that says: ```ChatGPT can make mistakes. Consider checking important informat
37.
by hanselot 3y ago
Just one or two probably. One right and one left wing publication. One side writes a piece, something like: "How the new Outlook saved my {insert protected class}", another one on the other side something like "New Microsoft
38.
by hanselot 3y ago
Though this is exactly what happened. The initial test was ran on a model that "Cheated" (aka has memorized the answers). The second test was run on a model that didn't "Cheat" as much, yet still got only 2% less sc
39.
by hanselot 3y ago
Isn't it a good thing that of the benchmarks they ran, the newer model has fewer of the answers memorized (aka, its parroting less)? Wouldn't this actually be exactly proof that the model has improved over its predecessor by havin
40.
by hanselot 3y ago
I think that's mostly because most people are skeptical about trusting people with IP. If there was a way to prove that the data was not being funneled into openai's next models, sure, but where is the proof of that? A piece of pa
41.
by hanselot 3y ago
Do I win because I didn't press either?
42.
by hanselot 3y ago
Please google what google was called before they changed the name.
43.
by hanselot 3y ago
People I like do something: "OMG, did you see that Y rebranded to Z??!!!" You can do the rest. Edit - lint + change name of vars to reduce complexity for the non-dutch.
44.
by hanselot 3y ago
Because you just haven't seen a correct implementation of AGILE. If we look at the AGILE Manifesto then we know for sure that there is no way this would ever be allowed if applied perfectly. And humans excel at perfect implementations.
45.
by hanselot 3y ago
When I read comments like this I have to go back and ask myself, is there even any amount of proof that would actually compel a single person to change their mind anymore? We have reached a level of outright cultural denial that, were Fauci
46.
by hanselot 3y ago
Ah you mean that time before reddit was entirely hivemind? The most valuable information on the Internet will always come from the chans. You just need to be able to evaluate everything with critical thinking. You know, that thing where you
47.
by hanselot 3y ago
Or my favourite thing to add as custom instruction: Rewrite this amateur's code like the lovechild of Molenaar (RIP) and van Rossum.
48.
by hanselot 3y ago
Every day of my life I wake up feeling more and more detached from the world. That people are even debating this is so incredibly stupid to me. The only people that will benefit from more onerous copyright are the major corporations that al
49.
by hanselot 3y ago
I've been experiencing carpal tunnel on and off for a couple of weeks now. I can tell you that reading through some code generated by "insert llm x" is substantially less painful than writing all of it by my own hand. Especi
50.
by hanselot 3y ago
You are probably right, I was just sleep deprived and angered when I wrote that reply. I am now only sleep deprived. I still use phind, and just came back here to say sorry to whoever, since it really does help me with productivity. Also,
51.
by hanselot 3y ago
I actually loved the original version when it just came out. It beat ChatGPT every time simply because it unlocked a portion of ChatGPT locked down by the knowledge cutoff. It was also quite speedy, and even the way it resists going into in
52.
by hanselot 3y ago
So how hard would it be to brute-force to some share links then? I have been using this for a lot of searching.Should probably have read the ToS. But to be fair, it feels way worse to use now than when it came out, so I guess I won't l
53.
by hanselot 3y ago
Don't bargain on that. For some the threshold is way too high given how far they've sunk. As always, the ones most vocal about it haven't even bothered trying out guanaco 70b 2bit. Probably don't know what ggml, gptq, cf
54.
by hanselot 3y ago
for self in selfs:
55.
by hanselot 3y ago
Sometimes the right thing is writing code in a language that reaches market before runway runs out.
56.
by hanselot 3y ago
This is weird. I've stopped going on LinkedIn because there is a constant barrage of recruiters. If you list the right skills they will find you.
57.
by hanselot 3y ago
Well, I can't give you a neurological point of view on it, but if you train an LLM to be great at handling a context size of 512 tokens, when you try to ask it to do a task which requires greater context length (or in this context - at
58.
by hanselot 3y ago
I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I am not qualified to give you advice on how to improve the build structure of your cardboard home. I advise you to speak to a qualified professional cardboardpenter or simply to go stand in the
59.
by hanselot 3y ago
Its a bit late to jump in here, but I would just like to share the observation that 90% of the comments here look like they were crafted by Microsoft's PR deparment. The rule expecting good faith arguments is entirely moot if corporate
60.
by hanselot 3y ago
I was recently surprised to find installing battle.net with Steam Proton is not only possible, but dead simple, and actually worked. I had been trying for days using the lutris installer, but just shit keeps breaking endlessly. At some poin

More ›