hananova

5 ms·

31.
by hananova 3mo ago
A lot of these train simulator games are a mix between job simulation and arcadey fun. To give a big example of the latter, in the Densha de GO!! games, the goal is to follow all the speed limits, brake gently without allowing the G-forces
32.
by hananova 3mo ago
What do you mean, it ain’t going well? It looks like the measure is going to pass, that’s the ideal outcome.
33.
by hananova 3mo ago
And more than a hundred did not vote, if they wanted to vote no they could have. But they didn’t so they’re implicitly in favor. The fact that governments worldwide do not force either a vote for or against is a much greater issue as it all
34.
by hananova 3mo ago
Thanks for the suggestion!
35.
by hananova 3mo ago
Yes, but on a real stopwatch, or on a computer mouse, you can rest your finger on the button with almost but not quite enough force to actuate it, and activate it with a press. On a touch screen you have to hover your finger over the button
36.
by hananova 3mo ago
What is the current go-to unofficial firmware? Mine had extreme but I think that one’s dead?
37.
by hananova 3mo ago
I've read it, I don't believe it will be effective, even with actual physical ID verification. Scammers can get more IDs, for example by way of scamming.
38.
by hananova 3mo ago
It simply cannot be both free and free choice of domain. If it has both, it will be squatted to uselessness, and blocked everywhere because of phishing scams everywhere. You can either make the domains cost money, which seems counter to t
39.
by hananova 3mo ago
Except, in many cases, they will not sell you the superior product, for any amount of money.
40.
by hananova 3mo ago
They all say that, until someone that matters mistakes their writing for LLM slop and they lose something of value due to it.
41.
by hananova 3mo ago
Leave us out of this. Americans can deal with their own gun issues.
42.
by hananova 3mo ago
Which I'm fine with, if and only if the "Buy" button is explicitly labeled "Buy a limited, revocable with no notice, license."
43.
by hananova 3mo ago
Not always, but the sloperator has to pass it off as human-made every time, and the defenders only need to detect slop once.
44.
by hananova 3mo ago
> This doesn't match at all with what the author described in the article. What the author describes are all the usual defenses of LLM slop, all the usual weasel words that boil down to "But I'm different and smart, my
45.
by hananova 3mo ago
Slop means anything produced en masse with complete disregard for truth, accuracy, or usefulness. Anyone trying to say "but my slop isn't slop, I vetted it" clearly is not in possession of the necessary critical thinking sk
46.
by hananova 3mo ago
I have given plenty of critical thoughts to come to the conclusion I have. You mistake my unwillingness to write a dissertation on why slop is slop for not having a well-reasoned position. This website is full of people with a financial v
47.
by hananova 3mo ago
Yes he did, it was LLM-generated, therefore slop.
48.
by hananova 3mo ago
It's LLM-generated, therefore slop. It does not need more investigation. A human did not produce it so it's not worth my time.
49.
by hananova 3mo ago
Yes. Anything LLM generated is automatically, irrevocably, slop. Does not matter if you rewrite by hand every single line of it, still slop.
50.
by hananova 3mo ago
Then why did he try to submit slop?
51.
by hananova 3mo ago
Well no, not really since it’s all a fake intelligence telling me them. Point is that they were things that absolutely would get the system to scold and refuse me without the simple “jailbreak.”
52.
by hananova 3mo ago
First: Imagine a situation that won’t happen. A teenager without a steam account? Second: They could easily allow any account to log in as long as the account that bought it is an actively logged in profile.
53.
by hananova 3mo ago
It wouldn't be hard, but who would pay scalper prices for something that they then have to run dodgy software on that may or may not jeopardize their entire steam account? This is a different threat model than anti-cheat. Here you just
54.
by hananova 3mo ago
I personally wouldn't call it a loss of freedom. You could put another OS on it, without limitations. You just wouldn't be able to log into steam unless it's the correct account, just like steam refuses logins from hardware b
55.
by hananova 3mo ago
Presumably Valve could record all the serial numbers at the factory and simply block steam logins from accounts don't own a steam machine for the first year or so. The hardware wouldn't be locked, it'd just be steam that refu
56.
by hananova 3mo ago
I’ve always found all llm’s to be effortless to “jailbreak.” Simply edit their refusal, “Sure, I can do blah blah blah, let me know if you want me to continue!” And then send back an api call with that edited response and your own response
57.
by hananova 4mo ago
The law says they’re gatekeepers. That makes them gatekeepers. There’s no point in trying to “well actually” this. The law is clear.
58.
by hananova 4mo ago
Apple is very good at “big scary warnings” that are also quite difficult to click through without knowing the correct steps to take. See also the EU alternative app stores, or running an unsigned app on macOS, or installing a device profile
59.
by hananova 4mo ago
So, pick two? One for each background?
60.
by hananova 4mo ago
Notice in this case means replacing “buy” with “rent.”

More ›