hananova

4 ms·

61.
by hananova 4mo ago
This is absolute fearmongering. Indie devs aren’t the ones releasing this always-online quadruple A garbage in the first place. They will be affected the least, since their games already would work just fine if the company ever goes belly u
62.
by hananova 4mo ago
Knowledge of it being absolutely useless slop is very useful for those of us that want to avoid all this garbage. There’s nothing shallow about it, it taught me that this project is slop.
63.
by hananova 4mo ago
The thing about the whole “frogs in boiling water” thing is that it doesn’t work. They’ll jump when it gets too hot. To counter it with another idiom, consider the concept of having nothing to lose. Remember I’m not claiming it’ll be fun, e
64.
by hananova 4mo ago
The limit to job loss is completely unrelated to AI capabilities. Rather it is social. There is a breaking point where if enough people end up jobless it will lead to genuine bloody uprisings. I won't pretend to know where exactly that
65.
by hananova 4mo ago
Scalpers will just do two transactions, one high one for the privilege of being able to buy the ticket, and then the sale at the listed limit. No, the real solution is to make tickets strictly id-bound and non-transferable in any way.
66.
by hananova 5mo ago
Well if AI keeps cannibalizing jobs, governments will HAVE to find a way to make UBI works. If they do not there will be deadly riots as people lose their livelihoods. There will simply have to be a solution, whether or not it’s deemed “imp
67.
by hananova 5mo ago
If you insist on knowing, include a different url in both that goes to the same place and use your damn server logs. You don’t need google analytics and whatever.
68.
by hananova 5mo ago
Hi Cliff! Your book the Cuckoo's Egg got me both (more) into IT, as well as helped my English proficiency go from basic to proficient. Back when I was 12, I was checked out in school, and my English teacher noticed here in Belgium. He
69.
by hananova 5mo ago
No, the olympics are a doping competition, and a meta-competition of “who is better at not getting detected.” In general, the statement “if they got a medal, they cheated” is true so much of the time that it becomes a sensible default assum
70.
by hananova 6mo ago
The nature of that setup makes it incredibly difficult to research. You'd have to answer a negative. Of course, that won't stop people that are anti-trigger warnings from using the irrelevant research (they don't work if you
71.
by hananova 6mo ago
All those papers look at the difference between "consuming content without being given a trigger warning" and "consuming content after being given a trigger warning." There has been no proper research on the effectiven
72.
by hananova 6mo ago
The average person can make one of those things happen, and not the others. Yes, the alternative is obviously better, but once violence becomes the only course of action with reasonable chance at good results, violence is what you will get.
73.
by hananova 6mo ago
What you think does not matter. You need to actually convince the downtrodden, otherwise these attacks will keep happening, and they will get worse.
74.
by hananova 6mo ago
Rule of thumb: - If it’s a company doing an NC license, probably best to be careful because they can make your life hell with lawyers. - If it’s a random joe doing an NC license, feel free to ignore it because they don’t have the money to d
75.
by hananova 6mo ago
A combination of key samplers and going with the first acceptable switch rather than trying all of them and going with the best.
76.
by hananova 6mo ago
Wait, does that mean that counterfeit money is legally money in the US?
77.
by hananova 6mo ago
It’d be money laundering because money went in on one end, and money came out at the other end. Bitcoin would’ve been the vehicle yes. Still not money though. Something doesn’t have to be money to be involved in money laundering, obviously.
78.
by hananova 6mo ago
How very astute of you. I was of course talking about folks sounding better combined with queer. This is subjective of course, but the writers agreed. What does it matter to you anyway?
79.
by hananova 6mo ago
You may consider yourself that, but given that you won’t even offer someone the pleasure of addressing them the way they want to be, you aren’t.
80.
by hananova 6mo ago
Perhaps, but it’s a good starting point, especially nowadays.
81.
by hananova 6mo ago
It’s just a word. People is fine too. Folks just sounds better.
82.
by hananova 6mo ago
Bryan did not hold him at gunpoint and forced him to click reject, he did that himself. Empathy is a core value of engineering.
83.
by hananova 6mo ago
I've always wondered, in cases like this where 8%+2% (for example) can either mean 10% or 8.16%, why doesn't the contract just give a fictional example of how the maths would work out?
84.
by hananova 6mo ago
Bitcoins aren't money.
85.
by hananova 6mo ago
I don't see how 1 is any issue at all. Using a computer to make the intended bitcoin calculations much faster than anyone else possibly can is entirely within the rules of how bitcoin works. It will also tank the price because by doing
86.
by hananova 6mo ago
The whole point of these services is that it’s not your account. It’s very much anthropic’s problem, and honestly I don’t care they’re getting ripped off.
87.
by hananova 6mo ago
No but they are experts in engineering their garbage to cause maximum damage.
88.
by hananova 6mo ago
To be fair that would probably count as art in the eyes of most people.
89.
by hananova 6mo ago
A company acting in good faith could provide both a binding version, and a version in plain language.
90.
by hananova 6mo ago
It always amazed me that even with this weakness, casino card games always use rear art that goes to the edge. While consumer cards often have a white border that would solve the issue entirely.

More ›