hackernews_7364

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hackernews_7364 9mo ago

   This is a fraud. The magnitude of their unsupported claims is a good indication but I suggest checking out their LinkedIn. They employ a handful of people none of them with a chemistry background, most of them don't have an engineering
2. 2.▲
   by hackernews_7364 10mo ago

   I don't think they are simplifications, I think they are misleading. Notice that I never disagreed with his underlying take. Everyone should have concerns about investments in the magnitude of 1 or 2 pp of GDP that serve novel and unpr
3. 3.▲
   by hackernews_7364 10mo ago

   There are many legitimate concerns about the financial implications of these huge investments in AI. In fact the podcast that he references is great at providing _informed_ and _nuanced_ observations about all of this - Paul Kedrosky is gre
4. 4.▲
   by hackernews_7364 10mo ago

   There's many questions about the overall economics of AI, its value, is it overvalued, is it not, etc. but this is a very poor article I suspect made by someone with little to no financial or accounting knowledge with a strong "u