habinero

25 ms·

661.
by habinero 2y ago
Why does that matter if they don't marry anyone? They control the means of reproduction, after all.
662.
by habinero 2y ago
You don't need a house to have kids. Plenty of people don't and they do just fine. And if they're choosing to have a kid on their own, they've planned out finances, too. Fertility treatments aren't cheap.
663.
by habinero 2y ago
You missed my point. A lot of guys act like it somehow taints someone for life or repeat all the redpill 'pair bonding' nonsense, and don't judge people on their own merits. You're not picking out make and model of a car
664.
by habinero 2y ago
That's true for every part of the human experience. People discriminate because of religion, etc. Sounds like you care too much about what other people think of you. Anyways, my point is this sort of thing is rapidly becoming something
665.
by habinero 2y ago
Education level is less important than equality is. Marriage is traditionally a terrible bargain for women, but it was the only choice they were allowed to make. Now, they can make their money and buy property and have kids on their own. A
666.
by habinero 2y ago
If you can only bond with computer software and not other humans, there's something pathological going on there. You definitely have some severe issues that should be worked out in therapy.
667.
by habinero 2y ago
No worries, you're correct, those lines don't rhyme. It's pretty common for English poetry and songs to only rhyme every other line
668.
by habinero 2y ago
Both are protected, because both are 1A activity.
669.
by habinero 2y ago
You're free to to make your own site with your own moderation controls. And nobody will use it, because it'll rapidly become 99.999% spam, CSAM and porn.
670.
by habinero 2y ago
There is no difference. Both are editorial choices and protected 1A activity.
671.
by habinero 2y ago
Yes, it is. Section 230 doesn't replace the 1A, and deciding what you want to show or not show is classic 1A activity.
672.
by habinero 2y ago
Any proof that they were threatened? I've never seen any.
673.
by habinero 2y ago
She's one of the most influential science fiction writers of all time, of course she has a tech following.
674.
by habinero 2y ago
The point of the gedanken experiment is it's mocking quantum mechanics. It's supposed to be ridiculous.
675.
by habinero 3y ago
Ahaha. Of course they would dare.
676.
by habinero 3y ago
Local governments or consortiums. You usually need to own something before you can destroy it. Besides, the government has a vested interest in acting before the dams fail and kill people.
677.
by habinero 3y ago
Neither. Almost all of the dams involved were built before 1920 and before we had powergrids. They were usually originally intended for some local industrial use and put out a (now) negligible amount of power. They're also at the end o
678.
by habinero 3y ago
That's only because we have no way to measure it, not because it's not also a physical problem.
679.
by habinero 3y ago
Yeah, same. I don't feel wired at all. It's pleasantly calming and it's like everything is possible again. I've literally taken a nap after it hits.
680.
by habinero 3y ago
Oh, you haven't met a lot of PDs, then. They'll tell you cops lie literally all the time and will make up evidence if they decide they don't like you. It's just easier and there's zero consequences for them if they&
681.
by habinero 3y ago
The difference is MH knows what's behind the doors and deliberately shows you a goat. It's not 50/50 because the choice wasn't random.
682.
by habinero 3y ago
No, you're solving the wrong thing. This is a thought experiment, not a real life scenario with ambiguity. In this thought experiment, MH will always open a door to a goat on purpose and always ask if you want to switch, because th
683.
by habinero 3y ago
That's for slower projects. You know the old adage "fast, cheap, good: pick two"? With startups, you're forced to pick fast. You're still probably not gonna make it, but if you don't build fast, you definitely
684.
by habinero 3y ago
Then I wouldn't be that worried about it.
685.
by habinero 3y ago
Neural networks are not new, and they're just mathematical systems. LLMs don't think. At all. They're basically glorified autocorrect. What they're good for is generating a lot of natural-sounding text that fools people
686.
by habinero 3y ago
We already have laws for when people are criminally negligent. You want people incentivized to participate in safety culture, not motivated to frame others or destroy evidence to save their jobs. People will always make mistakes and have
687.
by habinero 3y ago
No, that's absolutely not true. They can and have grounded entire aircraft lines. There's literally no reason to ban the aircraft.
688.
by habinero 3y ago
No, they logged it. Logging is not nothing. Planes are incredibly complex and have little problems like that all the time. It's not a safety issue. This was a brand new aircraft, this is almost certainly a manufacturing defect of some
689.
by habinero 3y ago
Commercial aviation is ridiculously safe and well-regulated. Worry about the ride to the airport instead. You're far more likely to die in a private plane or in an executive jet. GA aircraft crash constantly.
690.
by habinero 3y ago
The aviation side of Boeing doesn't do rockets. That's a completely separate org which is part of the ULA consortium. SpaceX has (ok, had) good PR, but they don't do anything others couldn't do. And they'd be bankru

More ›