habi

11 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by habi 3y ago

   That really depends what you plan to use where. Roads and foot navigation is generally quite good, POIs is good to use in large cities. Where do you see OSM data lacking?
2. 62.▲
   by habi 3y ago

   This is because no-one mapped the outline of the `building=construction` yet. You can do so if you know more, go to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592118388 and click the 'Edit' button. The currently avail
3. 63.▲
   by habi 3y ago

   I'm on iOS, so cannot test StreetComplete, as it's Android-only. I just know that a lot of people use it, but didn't know that it can only do quests. Every Door has a very good UI for editing `opening_hours` in my opinion,
4. 64.▲
   by habi 3y ago

   > It takes me like half an hour to edit a feature in OSM that would take about 1 min on Google Maps. You could use one of those two apps, editing a POI with them does not take half an hour. - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org&#
5. 65.▲
   by habi 3y ago

   > […] which got reviewers to shout at me multiple times about it As an avid OpenStreetMapper I’m sorry you’ve been shouted at for something that is „not recommended“, but not really a big issue. This should not happen in our community! A
6. 66.▲
   by habi 3y ago

   https://organicmaps.app/ is well suited for (completely) offline routing. Based on OpenStreetMap data, which can be updated yourself.
7. 67.▲
   by habi 3y ago

   OpenStreetMap has high enough usage that vandals enter incorrect data [0]. But such vandalism is generally corrected very quickly. [0]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
8. 68.▲
   by habi 3y ago

   Frederik Ramm went on to found Geofabrik: http://www.geofabrik.de/geofabrik/geofabrik.html
9. 69.▲
   by habi 3y ago

   The current default layer [1] has a short 'turnaround' time, meaning that changed tiles are quickly rendered, giving very short feedback time. The Tracestrack Topo is provided by a third party, without explicitly stated re-renderi
10. 70.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    > As far as I can tell, Tracestrack’s style is currently a closed-source style, which makes it an unlikely candidate for a default layer. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-carto-maintainers-... for a bit
11. 71.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    > This is why I prefer the OpenStreetMap scheme even though it has its share of controversies. At least they have rules to color important roads so they stand out more on the map. As it’s often said, OpenStreetMap is just the data :) One
12. 72.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    They enrich OpenStreetMap data “with other sources”, see the ‘relation with OpenStreetMap section’ on: https://overturemaps.org/resources/faq/
13. 73.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    https://osm-boundaries.com/ might be an 'easy' way to get the boundaries already present in OpenStreetMap.
14. 74.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    I really like https://github.com/mattDavo/Yippy for 'managing' my copy-pasting. It has an option to not paste as rich text.
15. 75.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    This can be nicely achieved with https://manubot.org , which produces a manuscript (a (possibly freely accessible) HTML, a PDF and a DOCX file) from a set of git-tracked Markdown files.
16. 76.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    > If it were up to me, I’d recommend keeping it with a flag that notes it as closed, rather than deleting it. OpenStreetMap has you covered with a so-called lifecycle prefix: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifec
17. 77.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    I meant the (free) low-zoom vs. (paid) high-zoom tiles. Can you tell us a bit about your rendering pipeline?
18. 78.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    And the low-res ones? Are you just loading them from ` https://tile.openstreetmap.org/${z}/${x}/${y}.png `?
19. 79.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    I am not a lawyer, just an avid OpenStreetMap editor and like to see where my contributions are used and credited. > And last and not least, it's not that the attribution is hidden or unreachable for the people using the app. It&#
20. 80.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    OK, I misunderstood the text and thought this should link to your terms of use, not the standard Apple ones
21. 81.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    Are you rendering your own tiles?
22. 82.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    This page shows Apple s attribution, not the one from your app. Your app has to show it in your app.
23. 83.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    Also, the AppStore description mentions "Terms of use: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/std... ", which should probably link to another place, i.e. to your site.
24. 84.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    "Legal" in the bottom left links to Apples servers and does not show the necessary attribution to OSM data, based on https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright Could you correct this?
25. 85.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    https://www.magicearth.com/ has OSM data for navigation and traffic information. In selected regions „official“ traffic data, otherwise crowd-sourced.
26. 86.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    Thanks for fixing this so quickly at the moment. And taking the time to fix it for good once your time permits.
27. 87.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    I've sent them a reminder about the missing attribution [1] via the contact form on https://www.winnipee.com/about.php?tab=contact [1]: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Attribution_
28. 88.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    OpenStretMap does not have aerial imagery per se , several imagery layers are available only for tracing features off them: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery#Ima...
29. 89.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    On iOS https://every-door.app/ wins for easiest `opening_hours` editor.
30. 90.▲
    by habi 3y ago

    Go Map!! recently introduced “Quests”, which are a bit like StreetComplete.