h_r

11 ms·

61.
by h_r 10y ago
Threatening others with physical violence after posting pictures of their kids, shit like that, isn't quite the same as a flying dildo though, right?
62.
by h_r 10y ago
How about "a net drain on resources that the provider of the resources would prefer to spend elsewhere"?
63.
by h_r 10y ago
What about those of us who like F# and want to use that? Are you supporting that as well?
64.
by h_r 10y ago
If you're doing OOP this can mean leveraging polymorphic behavior rather than switching on data or data types. It's good to keep in mind even if it doesn't fit every single case.
65.
by h_r 10y ago
I'm mainly a Java programmer here but I like F# a lot. Are there any problems using only F# with .NET Core apps? Do you really need to use C#?
66.
by h_r 10y ago
Has anyone tried Xamarin for building mobile apps? Not Xamarin Forms but the lower level tool kit? It sounds pretty good on paper. At work the only negative I heard from one team who tried it is it added too much bloat. But that might just
67.
by h_r 10y ago
Does the main organizer now acknowledge this was a mistake? Sincere question since I have no idea.
68.
by h_r 10y ago
I'd like to know what percentage of their business is from Apple though. I suspect it is their biggest customer by far.
69.
by h_r 10y ago
Maybe but they address this very point by saying the hum is only in the past few decades but tinnitus has been reported for very much longer. No idea how much data there really is either way.
70.
by h_r 10y ago
I think that would fall in the third type of report they are planning to sell: "The third report, which they plan to sell, will contain raw data from their assessments for anyone who wants to recreate them."
71.
by h_r 10y ago
let lowerCased = (s : string[] | undefined) => s!.map((str : string) => str.toLowerCase()); console.log(lowerCased(['A','B'])); console.log(lowerCased(undefined)); //boom! It doesn't coe
72.
by h_r 10y ago
Umm never? That's not the point. It's not changing (coercing) the type of anything, it's just allowing the call without flagging it as an error. The call at run time might still get passed an undefined and fail. It's lik
73.
by h_r 10y ago
>! is just an inline type coercion. Are you sure about that? It sounds more like a signal to the compiler to "trust me, I know what I'm doing" and would blow up if you passed undefined anyway. Maybe the author didn't
74.
by h_r 10y ago
What are some drawbacks you've experienced?
75.
by h_r 10y ago
The definition of "criminal treatment" is precisely the point here. Merely calling it criminal doesn't make it so.
76.
by h_r 11y ago
I find it interesting and funny that this video about metadata turned into one giant metadiscussion of the video with almost no mention of the actual content.
77.
by h_r 11y ago
Having a native code dependency in a Node package DOES seem pretty insane to me though, unless absolutely forced. I'm surprised Google would do that.
78.
by h_r 11y ago
It's obvious you never worked for a large bureaucratic company having to support many intranet legacy web apps. Of course you can run another browser for the other stuff. This is about the financial costs of software resulting in &quot
79.
by h_r 11y ago
What I think is funny is that he said exactly why in the second paragraph. You make it seem as if you got so pissed off at the first sentence that you immediately hit the reply link without bothering to read what he said. Why not address th
80.
by h_r 11y ago
Did you get to the end? He says explicitly that inequality is inevitable. He's asking whether the American kind of vast inequality is necessary.
81.
by h_r 11y ago
Adding to all the good points that others mentioned, this sort of consistency only grows in importance in large companies where developers support many different projects. It allows you to focus on the business problems rather than spend ti
82.
by h_r 11y ago
I'm curious what you call it when you add an API to some business functions that run on a mainframe in order to make them available to other external software written Java or .NET, for example. This kind of thing is done all the time i
83.
by h_r 11y ago
This is what I was thinking and I must have been thinking about it a lot longer before hitting the reply button because I believe I said almost the same thing. I just wanted to mention that I wouldn't have posted my reply if yours was
84.
by h_r 11y ago
I have to say I find this line of thinking somewhat incoherent. I'm thinking of cases where someone creates software and also offers an API to enable tooling, alternative interfaces and that sort of thing. Take Github or Microsoft TFS,
85.
by h_r 11y ago
I'm one more person who had the same reaction to idea of a panic button. After spending a couple of minutes on the site I merely felt confused about what it was supposed to be.
86.
by h_r 12y ago
Such a "spec" would not be able to describe how systems interact: protocols, failure modes, SLAs, etc. In other words, the kinds of things you want specified when engineering a system. These are also specs
87.
by h_r 12y ago
To be fair, planning ahead and getting it right requires a relatively stable specification of the requirements. This is not often found in a typical business environment.
88.
by h_r 12y ago
Showing what? That you might have been using your own node for something?
89.
by h_r 12y ago
I don't know what it is about water but I run along the lake Michigan shore. The sound of the water lapping against the wall or crashing onto the shore is a great stress reducer.
90.
by h_r 12y ago
I disagree but it is tough to reach consensus on this without a real definition being offered, and there was none. You actually are free to express yourself however you like without violating laws or the civil rights of others. All I heard

More ›