Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
h91wka
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
31.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
This is a misleading statement. There is consensus that there are no traces of gene editing in the virus. But this statement is not equal to "it wasn't produced in the lab".
32.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
> which are obviously implanted by the US media narative As a non-american, please don't speak for us all. Also, using word "obviously" doesn't substitute for factual evidence. There are plenty of people skeptical abo
33.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
"M = Alt", "C = Control" is such a trivial thing to remember, yet it is brought up as a critical emacs deficiency every time. Why isn't this argument brought up in every Mac/PC discussion, or Xbox versus playst
34.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
In what sad, warped alternative reality did this happen?
35.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
I double that. Some years ago I almost lost the entire synced state after adding a new device that hadn't synced anything yet. For some reason syncthing decided that the new device has the most recent version of the data and happily st
36.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
To be fair, one can manage infrastructure with Ansible too.
37.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
As a systems Erlang designer who worked for 2 of the biggest Erlang companies in the market, I can assure you that Erlang/OTP is not some magic pixie dust that suddenly makes all the distributed systems problems go away. Playing is one
38.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
> Replication costs have nothing to do with anything here. Replication is the cornerstone of fault-tolerance. When logic is written in high-level languages with some minimal good practices, most SW bugs result in crashes rather than data
39.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
To commenters who compare work of programmer with the work of civil engineer: There is an explanation to this discrepancy. Risk = probability of fault * cost of fault. Programmers usually work with the data. Data has a pretty very unique pr
40.
▲
by
h91wka
6y ago
This was a showstopper for me back when I decided to go with posteo.net instead. Well, better late than never, hopefully their service will become useful for more people.
41.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
There is another positive side effect of limiting customization to reasonable levels. Default Emacs shortcuts are hidden everywhere. Most importantly, bash understands them, as well as many other REPLs (erlang, ghci, julia, ...). Developing
42.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
Maplesoft Maple is more powerful. hides
43.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
> That's not me. ... So I don't downvote anybody ever Ok, sorry for false accusations. I, too, never downvote anyone for the same reason.
44.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
As far as I know, in Swedish å does not have any ambiguity and is always read as "o" (as in "ocean"). My point is that different people pronounce things as they are used to, reflecting it in a writing system leads to com
45.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
That's not what you said in the original post. Also I would appreciate if you stop downvoting my posts, as I believe input from a native speaker may be valuable to someone.
46.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
> The Russians writing system tries to be phonetic but doesn't seem to do well this way. It does not? Creating a fully phonetic writing system that is also consistent is an impossible task. For example, different dialects can interc
47.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
> That's because е is usually used to represent the same sound if it's not in the beginning of the word. This is far from being a general rule. Your example is an exception. Consider "мера", "монета", "
48.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
This diagram doesn't show semigroup and monoid. Although these structures aren't used in physics much, I find them very useful for understanding groups.
49.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
I specifically mentioned in my post that problems related to _proof search_ are undecidable. Coq's tactics for proof search are unreliable. They rely on timeouts and tend to fail ("omega can't solve this system"). So you
50.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
This argument has been risen and dismissed in this thread already, no need to repeat.
51.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
No. In CIC I can prove that, say, some property is valid for _any_ natural number. Your "memory is bounded" argument is invalid, as formal proofs can go beyond that.
52.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
...Also I think you don't realize that formal inductive proofs can easily reason about programs operating with unbounded memory.
53.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
This technically correct comment would be actually useful, if it linked a fully automated prover, that is capable of proving any property of a program that fits in N bytes. If you remove infinite tape, you go from undecidable to "just&
54.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
> Is it possible to have a programming language where the compiler does the formal verification? Such compiler would require solving halting problem. Most problems related to search of formal proofs are undecidable.
55.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
> Appeal to junior developers and hobbyists is critical for large scale adoption. Hmm, I have personally trained Erlang to half a dozen juniors and interns. Any person who knows basics of programming can pick it up and write/fix mun
56.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
I have long since learned that dismissing languages based on their syntax is very punitive, as novel and powerful languages very often come with unfamiliar syntax. Syntax is the least difficult thing to learn. Things like type system, appro
57.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
Quick search reveals that some people have encoded Euclid's axioms in Coq (Lean and Coq are based on roughly the same theory): http://geocoq.github.io/GeoCoq/
58.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
Edge is packaged with Windows. Chrome used Trojan horse tactics to get into the computers. Back in the 2010s when it just appeared, almost any popular freeware installer got sneaky "Also install Google Chrome and make it the default br
59.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
Very true. Two years ago I fully switched to qwant and DDG, and never looked back. It's not because these two engines are great, it's because Google's output is as good as random.
60.
▲
by
h91wka
7y ago
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. By delaying the response they made their bottom line sink exponentially deeper.
More ›