Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
h1d
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
181.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
Bad news is that so many exchanges use it as it is such a useful instrument for users who wish to get out of crypto temporarily when their exchanges don't support fiat trading. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/
182.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
It's funny people complain about regulation until they get screwed over.
183.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
McAfee seems to know /s https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-23/john-mcaf...
184.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
Lightweight and it's simple for non devs to pick up the interface as well, using it across multiple companies, zero complaints.
185.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
I thought the Ubuntu's decision that they can include it in their release was controversial but are they that convinced the license allows them to do that?
186.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
btrfs no longer feels convincing when RedHat thinks it's no longer worth pursuing it.
187.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
Also gets cheaper on 2nd and 3rd year.
188.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
SequelPro for MySQL. Postico for PostgreSQL. I don't use it but TablePlus has support for quite a few db and it's also available on Windows.
189.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
You sound like preparing to use VS Code is like preparing to get vim right for your use. VS Code is far easier. "Newest and greatest" can be achieved so easily, not sure what you're complaining about. The real strong point is
190.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
Windows app GUI is a joke. After people widely used Windows for over 20 years, their cluttered interface never got any better having 10 menus, 20 buttons shown at once where many of Mac apps got that right with simpler and effective interfa
191.
▲
by
h1d
7y ago
Linux seems to have decent dev environment with VS Code now, maybe except for a good lightweight GUI database manager. Mac just has the best overall quality apps because people are used to paying $10, $20 for something decent. I'll nev
192.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
When do you need to use a complex configuration system like this? Aren't they supposed to be predefined values?
193.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
Official json5 site does mention using .json5 extension to be obvious but I bet people will just use .json which will be confusing if the file is passed to another party and they get parse error until they realize it's json5. I think t
194.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
When they call it a json parser, they should stick to json or call it json5 parser. There is no "relaxed" json.
195.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
I bet it was far more exhausting to be a developer before 2000. They only had "don't do this but since it's all we got, do it anyway". Feel the luxury of choice not complain about it.
196.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
Really tired of cutting the last element in an array and causes an error on that last little comma in json. TOML to the rescue.
197.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
Lucky your parsers have been behaving as you expect when the format isn't even standardized. You can keep building "cool" stuff with a bit more solid format as well.
198.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
Shows how people just want to stand out from the average with elitism without decent back up facts.
199.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
Somehow not widely spread. I can't believe json was standardized with all those shortcomings.
200.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
I don't care if it has "won" in a few places, I'll be using TOML and mindshare can change who has "won" later.
201.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
> TOML resolves a lot of these issues The only complaint is that the name TOML isn't as cool as other formats.
202.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
No standard = deal breaker. Comments might work for a parser but not on another. What's the point when you can do better with TOML?
203.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
How do you tell if a file is json or json5? Feels better to forget about json for config and go with the obvious TOML that has single file extension with single standard.
204.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
It's hard to believe json standardized without comment section and everything json5 fixes. TOML is fine.
205.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
At this point I think it's the ecosystem that you pick and not exactly the language feature.
206.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
Discourse too. But frankly I wish people stop making publicly releasing software as rails app, the resource usage is just insane. I always have to upgrade my server just because of running a single rails app.
207.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
Do people in mission critical systems (like life threatening) write code from scratch all the time without using any external dependencies? I'm sure they don't reinvent encryption. I'd like to know how they audit their system
208.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
For a task like taking backups on servers that involves invoking bunch of commands, I'd rather not use a scripting language that asks you to open a process, bind variables on its stdin/stdout and all the boilerplate handling. How
209.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
Many users = more vocal minorities and elitist who can't help but bash mass adopted products
210.
▲
by
h1d
8y ago
I think it's more from being forced to use some framework you didn't like for too long. I've done PHP for more than 10 years and got no problem using it if I have to. OTOH, I don't want to touch stuff like rails because
More ›