gyesxnuibh

6 ms·

1.
by gyesxnuibh 2mo ago
I'm not sure I fully understand your question, but the heartbeat time outs and leader election time outs are static. And yeah if you make votes and heartbeats time out in a way that nobody can be elected, then raft can't make prog
2.
by gyesxnuibh 2mo ago
The raft algorithm works and if you implemented a less complex state machine (like using a simpler kv store that doesn't need global event ordering via revisions and watches) it would work. That's what antithesis said they did to
3.
by gyesxnuibh 2mo ago
Their lock, leader election, sessions, and leases are all awful and I'd never recommend anyone to use those. But as a strongly consistent kv store and if you need the watch mechanics, its useful. It has its place and that's mostl
4.
by gyesxnuibh 2mo ago
Having run a fleet of 100s of etcd clusters for 10000s of rps, and the fact that upstream runs tests similar to antithesis and recently partnered with antithesis [0], and jepsen has tested it long ago as well [1]. Etcd's raft algorithm
5.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
My point in that second question was: Is the human challenge of getting a lot of inexperienced engineers to fully understand the LLM output actually worth the time, effort and money to solve vs sticking to solving the technical problems tha
6.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
I think they're saying typically the kernel one of the last places you'd expect the bug, so it shows that it is battle tested? I don't think they're being snarky.
7.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
Does that work as well with non-strangers who are your coworker? I'm not sure. Also if you're organizationally changing the culture to force people to put more effort in writing the code, why are you even organizationally using LL
8.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
> /tmp A directory made available for applications that need a place to create temporary files. Applications shall be allowed to create files in this directory, but shall not assume that such files are preserved between invocations
9.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
That book was written with 40% of the engineers compared to when I left a couple years ago (not sure how many now with the layoffs now). I'm guessing those hires haven't read it yet. So yeah, reads like standards slipping to me.
10.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
My take away with the final statement of rolling it yourself if it sounds fun is to pick whatever technology that gets your pen on the paper so to speak. If unity gets you making the thing or making the engine gets you making the thing, mos
11.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
Yeah I'm on the maintainers side with the whole > Do your job Which is a volunteer based job lol. Even if it was said in a heated argument, the bug reporter never really apologizes from what I read. Maybe that's a "strawma
12.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
Rewriting hundreds of thousands of lines of code just isn't really feasible honestly. Maybe you just mean the actually bottle neck can use C bindings or whatever. Or, maybe you can migrate some microservices and hope it goes smoothly.
13.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
Corporations don't just blip into existence overnight. Startups use a prototyping language fixing the problems and then suddenly you realize you need types and rewriting is a waste of time, money, and a risk to the business. > Does
14.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
What's the ML in HTML stand for? I think that's probably the crux of the argument. Are we gonna evolve it past its name?
15.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
Accomplishing things for me feels a lot like solving a good puzzle. Like a crossword. I tried using an LLM to help with a small hardware project and ended up throwing out all the code halfway down the line and doing it myself. I don't
16.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
I'm not sure that's necessarily true. People still do embroidering even though there's crazy embroidery machines (though the cost barrier there is probably related). Maybe LLMs will be too cost prohibitive in the future (once
17.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
I took it to mean that people (clients) would give the project fake data for fun. But there's no statement about how those people might find the project (basically not necessarily people from hackernews). You both are agreeing with eac
18.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
I could've sworn it was removed from the handbook like 2018/2019
19.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
I'm a little confused on how this helped your design doc? It seems like you picked the design that the LLM could best implement? I was really curious about how it helped you iron out the problems but couldn't figure it out from yo
20.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
Well my most trusted assistant would be the kernel by that definition
21.
by gyesxnuibh 1y ago
Not all jobs are created equal. I know the quality control for software written for Web is very very different than the software written for cloud. You're arguing that the standards for medical device firmware should be the same for Pi
22.
by gyesxnuibh 2y ago
Who catches breaks more than men?
23.
by gyesxnuibh 2y ago
You wouldn't get an answer from a tiger. Sorry, my lack of empathy for you is making me woefully obtuse.
24.
by gyesxnuibh 2y ago
There are other societies than the American one and I recommend you look at them before you make such sweeping statements
25.
by gyesxnuibh 2y ago
Well you can talk to people every day and still be lonely. It's a bit too surface level to take it that literally.
26.
by gyesxnuibh 2y ago
I bought my minis 3d printed off Etsy, I bought some random wet erase map and markers, and I bought a non-d&d licensed 5e module. I thought this was the whole license debacle which got walked back? I already owned a 5e players handbook
27.
by gyesxnuibh 2y ago
Why buy the cow when you get the milk for free tho?