gwniobombux

3 ms·

1.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
Enterprise grade support comes to mind.
2.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
That credit is probably due to William Schelter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Schelter
3.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
This: "We’ve got an album (When Will Then Be Now?), too, which we’re trying to get on iTunes. That will be a sad day for the music industry." made me chuckle.
4.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
Would Apple sell AMD chips to other Manufacturers or would you only be able to get them in Apple hardware? I don't think Apple is interested to start selling chips. And I wouldn't want Intel to basically be the only chip manufacturer for no
5.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
Nope, Stallman does not attack Gates FOR his philanthropy. That's misstating the facts. He questions the mode of operation of the Gates Foundation based on an LA Times article, possibly this one: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nat
6.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
RMS doesn't have a problem with the ACL code (obviously he would prefer the GPL for it, but I reckon he would consider it free software), as he doesn't have a problem with GNU/Linux distributions shipping e.g. BSD-licensed code. And, yes, h
7.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
Why? Could you elaborate? Just like Stallman actually explains, why he thinks proprietary software wrong.
8.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
That seems to be the time reddit.com went live. Compare this Guardian article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2005/dec/08/innovations...
9.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
Dr. Ramachandran relates this case (capgras syndrome) in his TED talk as well. http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/184
10.
by gwniobombux 18y ago
I think it's okay not to opensource, since you're not distributing software but offering a service. Free software is about sharing and a sense of community. Running a piece of software on your machine, you should be free to inspect and modi