guyzmo

6 ms·

1.
by guyzmo 9y ago
a coconut!
2.
by guyzmo 9y ago
I'm guilty of the Lua feature, and even though it's only covering the existing muttrc API, it can already do quite a lot. The Lua feature is (not yet) turned on by default at compile time (and thus in systems distributions). I&#x2
3.
Git trick: setup one remote with multiple urls(i.got.nothing.to)
4 points by guyzmo 10y ago|0 comments
4.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Oh, I need to make a ticket about adding that to the wizard. Be my guest if you want to :-)
5.
by guyzmo 10y ago
<3 I guess you're referring to my other project :-)
6.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Yes there is! There's a bug that has been found that crashes the feature, but I got a patch ready to publish.
7.
by guyzmo 10y ago
thank you. Please suggest a better name! :-D
8.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Well, for the easy to remember, I might have been presomptuous O:-)
9.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Well as I said for another post I'm aware of that. As the google project is mostly used only for android and chromium, and as the canonical name of the tool really is /repo/ and not /git-repo/, there's no real
10.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Well, TBH, as an engineer, I hate to reinvent the wheel. I prefer to join and improve the existing concept with my own ideas to make it the synthesis of many peoples ideas You might see on my github that I do that a lot, I'm being some
11.
by guyzmo 10y ago
My bad, I did not scroll down to see how complete the command set was. At the top of the readme the list of commands is misleading (I thought there were only those at the first read). I'm not sure I can see a real use for checking out
12.
by guyzmo 10y ago
hehe, it's also implemented in git-repo: `git hub open`
13.
by guyzmo 10y ago
note that I did not say that git has a good UX, I said it's /rather well designed/… Maybe should I have emphazised on the /rather/, or used something stronger like /relatively/ . But anyway, designing the
14.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Thank you, though pretty close, our approaches are slightly different. My main focus is use case, I did not implement the social features of a repository, because those are things that happen happily in a browser. But project/merge req
15.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Bitbucket support is there. But it's not feature complete, and not up to my standards… The issue I have is that I got to implement OAuth2 for bitbucket, because the privatekey scheme offered by bitbucket does not work for a CLI tool us
16.
by guyzmo 10y ago
nah, I don't think so, I think you might have reloaded as I was recompiling the blog
17.
by guyzmo 10y ago
And I hope also level the game for alternatives to github. Git is distributed by nature, and we should only be happy to see cross services forks happening!
18.
by guyzmo 10y ago
what the… ok I totally missed that one! And I DID search before writing such a tool
19.
by guyzmo 10y ago
See the issues, it's already implemented, but not released yet. The issue is that I also am working on the gitlab snippets… which lacks an API. So I'm currently working on a patch to add an API to the gitlab snippets, so my tool c
20.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Well, first the name really is `git-repo` not `repo`, and as nobody has really heard of it yet, the pypi package is already on first page of go, and second page of google. I hope that if people like the tool, it's going to be easier to
21.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Thanks, fixed
22.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Well, I saw about hub, but I wasn't happy with the fact that it's a github only tool, I really wanted a service agnostic tool, and also because the CLI API was not great. I don't want a tool to replace git, I want it to exten
23.
by guyzmo 10y ago
thank you a lot for your comments I actually wrote that tool based on a huge frustration I had going back and forth to the browser, and not being able to work while being agnostic to the services, which felt being a totally broken UX. I hav
24.
Git-repo – Manage Gitlab, GitHub and Bitbucket from the command line(i.got.nothing.to)
301 points by guyzmo 10y ago|69 comments
25.
by guyzmo 10y ago
The sad truth is: s/Some/Most/
26.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Yes! Exactly! I added the py3 links of those in my big lengthy parent comment, so people get twice the chance to RTFM !
27.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Well, private fields are all members starting with an underscore and that are not publicised in the documentation. /That/ includes double underscores mangled members and and "magic" methods.
28.
by guyzmo 10y ago
Yes, it is intended and fully part of the philosophy behind the language's design (as shown in PEP-20, aka the Zen of Python): > Explicit is better than implicit So there's no "leaking" of implementation details, beca
29.
by guyzmo 10y ago
just been fixing that, though I've added four, I hope it's ok
30.
by guyzmo 10y ago
The part of the article about an issue with name mangling of private fields is somehow misleading. The feature is just some syntactic sugar. When within a class, private fields such as: class Foo: def __init__(self):

More ›