Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
guy98238710
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Why? What's wrong with having others promote your ideas for free?
32.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
It's so sad and also terrifying when people call this real world programming.
33.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Yes, soldier up, doggie! This world is not for pussies. Ditto for babies. Stop crying and man up! This world is for warriors. Fight and die!
34.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
> Even here in Germany, any blog, including private ones, need to come with an imprint section including your full name, residential address, mobile phone number et cetera. How can this be consistent with GDPR? AFAIK, WHOIS data had to b
35.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
I would add a point to the pros: - Even in the (very unlikely) case that nobody actually reads your post, language models will. They have to, because there's never enough training data. Your ideas will be merged into the text that LLMs
36.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
> To release ideas that you have in your head and that you need to get out. This. Getting ideas out of my head is the reason not only for blogging but also for all my opensource work. BTW, never sign an NDA. Locking ideas in your head wi
37.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
So perhaps a new UK-focused app that everyone sideloads?
38.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
One could easily argue that bullying in school is a much more widespread threat to children and the government is okay with that.
39.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Isn't noise in the data going to dominate output size of lossless compression? Wouldn't linguistics and vision be better off with direct measurements of predictive strength?
40.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
This is such a great time to be a lawyer. Just play any AI like a slot machine until it gives you incorrect results and then sue. Probability is a bitch.
41.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Marketing. OpenAI needs to create illusion that their chatbot is more than just gradual evolution of past models that still needs a lot of work.
42.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Just pirate the books. You are only attracting attention of sharks when you pay.
43.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Dogs don't get cavities. Human saliva is more acidic.
44.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
If you are very smart, chances are you will be able to obtain some power and influence. This is expected of AIs. Such effects can be however undone the same way you can undo effects of an explosion at a refinery (while punishing those respo
45.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
> On your specific point, humans take decades to (very roughly) copy themselves. An AI could do it in minutes with far more precision and control. Copying AIs just results in effectively higher intelligence (bigger brain). Things would b
46.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
> One day some other small hairless monkies want you to go extinct. Will they succeed. The hairless monkeys were embodied and violent and they still took millions of years to dominate. The question is whether intelligence on its own prov
47.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Only if the body is duplicated too. If I could just make my brain bigger, I don't think my odds would improve much. Quite to the contrary. An AI with higher dependency on compute power seems more vulnerable.
48.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
I don't get this scare about AI. Imagine, you are a genius with IQ 200. You have studied hard your entire life and you are now an expert in several fields. One day you decide to conquer the world. Will you succeed or not?
49.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
There are some 100T to 1P synapses in the 20W human brain (of which we have 8bn). Every synapse is a little molecular computer with several kinds of memory and its own inference and learning logic. AFAIK the biggest limitation of von Neuman
50.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
> Artificial Intelligence is moving fast We wish. AI is hardware-limited and hardware is not moving fast. We are very, very far from matching raw compute power of the human brain. Robots are even more limited compared to human body.
51.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Fine-tuning is like statically linking a large library (available in binary form only) to a small app. (An optimizing linker can blend app and library code so much they cannot be distinguished.) Weights intended for fine-tuning are still a
52.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Dunno who these guys are, but generally w.r.t. ML licensing, research kit is the important thing nobody is publishing. You know, the code used for diagnostics, visualization, benchmarks, decision support, etc. Research kit can be orders of
53.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
The chart in the linked paper shows sharp drop between 20 and 30 years already. I remember another chart that I cannot find now, which showed wider age range and more components of intelligence and that one showed some peaks between 12 and
54.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
> Published work by experts in the field who have thought deeply about the subject, published works on the subject, and even designed and tested new curricula in a scientific manner. This is called "paralysis by analysis", a sp
55.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
I am all for evidence-based decisions, but you are asking for evidence that sky is indeed blue. Like seriously, you want me to prove that math is actually used somewhere? How about it being used in the evidence you are asking for? And when
56.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
And BTW, it's not my job to show something is propaganda. It's curriculum designer's job to show everything in the curriculum is an undeniable scientific fact. That's easy to do with math or physics but much harder with
57.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
What religious fundamentalists? Maybe in the US? Where I live, schools are actually a source of aggressive religious propaganda. But the problems with schools are far wider than that they become ideological battlefields with propaganda-fill
58.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
Evidence of what? That doing arithmetic by hand like in 19th century (as opposed to arithmetic understanding/intuition/modeling) has zero applications in professional and personal life? Isn't that obvious? When was the last t
59.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
This is for fearless kids. Most kids, I think, would be scared to death by these suggestions. It's an embarrassment minefield. It's better to start experimenting in a more private way in places where you are clearly welcome - stud
60.
▲
by
guy98238710
3y ago
> Yes, don't we all hate it when people come into our job and tell us how to do it? Teachers apparently need to be told, because they spend YEARS teaching kids how to do arithmetic on paper instead of handing out calculators and foc
More ›